AIMS: The endothelium plays a role in regulating vascular tone. Acute and dynamic changes in low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC) and how it changes with regard to traditional flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) have not been described. We aimed to investigate the changes in brachial artery L-FMC following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and during recovery from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: FMD was performed in accordance with a previously described technique in patients before and after PCI and in the recovery phase of NSTEMI, but in addition, L-FMC data were acquired from the last 30 s of cuff inflation. About 135 scans were performed in 96 participants (10 healthy volunteers and 86 patients). Measurement of brachial L-FMC was reproducible over hours. L-FMC was greater among patients with unstable vs. stable coronary atherosclerosis (-1.33 ±1.09% vs. -0.03 ± 1.26%, P < 0.01). Following PCI, FMD reduced (4.43 ± 2.93% vs. 1.66 ± 2.16%, P < 0.01) and L-FMC increased (-0.33 ± 0.76% vs. -1.63 ± 1.15%, P = 0.02). Furthermore, during convalescence from NSTEMI, L-FMC reduced (-1.37 ± 1.19% vs. 0.01 ± 0.82%, P = 0.02) in parallel with improvements in FMD (2.54 ± 2.19% vs. 5.15 ± 3.07%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Brachial L-FMC can be measured reliably. Differences were observed between patients with stable and unstable coronary disease. L-FMC was acutely increased following PCI associated with reduced FMD and, in the recovery from NSTEMI, L-FMC reduced associated with increased FMD. These novel findings characterize acute and subacute variations in brachial L-FMC. The pathophysiological and clinical implications of these observations require further study.
AIMS: The endothelium plays a role in regulating vascular tone. Acute and dynamic changes in low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC) and how it changes with regard to traditional flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) have not been described. We aimed to investigate the changes in brachial artery L-FMC following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and during recovery from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS:FMD was performed in accordance with a previously described technique in patients before and after PCI and in the recovery phase of NSTEMI, but in addition, L-FMC data were acquired from the last 30 s of cuff inflation. About 135 scans were performed in 96 participants (10 healthy volunteers and 86 patients). Measurement of brachial L-FMC was reproducible over hours. L-FMC was greater among patients with unstable vs. stable coronary atherosclerosis (-1.33 ±1.09% vs. -0.03 ± 1.26%, P < 0.01). Following PCI, FMD reduced (4.43 ± 2.93% vs. 1.66 ± 2.16%, P < 0.01) and L-FMC increased (-0.33 ± 0.76% vs. -1.63 ± 1.15%, P = 0.02). Furthermore, during convalescence from NSTEMI, L-FMC reduced (-1.37 ± 1.19% vs. 0.01 ± 0.82%, P = 0.02) in parallel with improvements in FMD (2.54 ± 2.19% vs. 5.15 ± 3.07%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Brachial L-FMC can be measured reliably. Differences were observed between patients with stable and unstable coronary disease. L-FMC was acutely increased following PCI associated with reduced FMD and, in the recovery from NSTEMI, L-FMC reduced associated with increased FMD. These novel findings characterize acute and subacute variations in brachial L-FMC. The pathophysiological and clinical implications of these observations require further study.
Authors: C V Serrano; J A Ramires; M Venturinelli; S Arie; E D'Amico; J L Zweier; F Pileggi; P L da Luz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R R Azar; R G McKay; F J Kiernan; B Seecharran; Y J Feng; D B Fram; A H Wu; D D Waters Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1997-12-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: T J Anderson; A Uehata; M D Gerhard; I T Meredith; S Knab; D Delagrange; E H Lieberman; P Ganz; M A Creager; A C Yeung Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield Journal: Lancet Date: 1992-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Noyan Gokce; John F Keaney; Liza M Hunter; Michael T Watkins; Zoran S Nedeljkovic; James O Menzoian; Joseph A Vita Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-05-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Marco V Wainstein; Sandro C Gonçalves; Alcides J Zago; Raquel Zenker; Renata Burttet; Guilherme de B Couto; Fabiana Tomazi; Jorge P Ribeiro Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Andrew J Taylor; Alex Bobik; Mark Richards; David Kaye; Geoffrey Raines; Paul Gould; Garry Jennings Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Saurabh S Thosar; Alec M Berman; Maya X Herzig; Andrew W McHill; Nicole P Bowles; Christine M Swanson; Noal A Clemons; Matthew P Butler; Aaron A Clemons; Jonathan S Emens; Steven A Shea Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Juan Torrado; Yanina Zócalo; Ignacio Farro; Federico Farro; Claudio Sosa; Santiago Scasso; Justo Alonso; Daniel Bia Journal: Int J Reprod Med Date: 2015-09-02
Authors: Kunihiko Aizawa; Salim Elyas; Damilola D Adingupu; Francesco Casanova; Kim M Gooding; W David Strain; Angela C Shore; Phillip E Gates Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2016-06