Stephan Fichtlscherer1, Susanne Breuer, Andreas M Zeiher. 1. Department of Internal Medicine IV, Division of Cardiology, Johann W. Goethe University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany. fichtlscherer@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endothelial vasodilator dysfunction may serve as a marker integrating the vascular risk of an individual; however, whether systemic vasodilator function predicts disease progression and cardiovascular event rates in patients with manifest acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 198 patients with angiographically documented ACS, forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to acetylcholine (ACH; 10 to 50 microg/min) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 2 to 8 microg/min) were measured by venous occlusion plethysmography before hospital discharge within 5 days of an episode of an ACS. Cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) served as outcome variables over a mean follow-up period of 47.7+/-15.1 months. Patients who experienced cardiovascular events during follow-up (n=31) had a significantly reduced vasodilator response to ACH (P<0.05) and SNP (P<0.05). By multivariate analysis, vasodilator response to ACH and elevated troponin T serum levels were the only significant (P<0.05) independent predictors of a poor prognosis, even after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, concurrent medication, invasive treatment strategy, and C-reactive protein serum levels. Recovery of endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity as assessed by repeated FBF assessment 8 weeks after the index measurement after the ACS predicted further event-free survival in a subset of 78 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity predicts recurrence of instability and cardiovascular event rates in patients with ACS. Furthermore, the recovery of systemic endothelial function is associated with event-free survival. Assessment of systemic vasoreactivity, measured by a minimally invasive test, provides important prognostic information in addition to that derived from traditional risk factor assessment in patients with ACS.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial vasodilator dysfunction may serve as a marker integrating the vascular risk of an individual; however, whether systemic vasodilator function predicts disease progression and cardiovascular event rates in patients with manifest acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 198 patients with angiographically documented ACS, forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to acetylcholine (ACH; 10 to 50 microg/min) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 2 to 8 microg/min) were measured by venous occlusion plethysmography before hospital discharge within 5 days of an episode of an ACS. Cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) served as outcome variables over a mean follow-up period of 47.7+/-15.1 months. Patients who experienced cardiovascular events during follow-up (n=31) had a significantly reduced vasodilator response to ACH (P<0.05) and SNP (P<0.05). By multivariate analysis, vasodilator response to ACH and elevated troponin T serum levels were the only significant (P<0.05) independent predictors of a poor prognosis, even after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, concurrent medication, invasive treatment strategy, and C-reactive protein serum levels. Recovery of endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity as assessed by repeated FBF assessment 8 weeks after the index measurement after the ACS predicted further event-free survival in a subset of 78 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity predicts recurrence of instability and cardiovascular event rates in patients with ACS. Furthermore, the recovery of systemic endothelial function is associated with event-free survival. Assessment of systemic vasoreactivity, measured by a minimally invasive test, provides important prognostic information in addition to that derived from traditional risk factor assessment in patients with ACS.
Authors: Felipe Díez-Delhoyo; Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibañes; Gerard Loughlin; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; María Eugenia Vázquez-Álvarez; Fernando Sarnago-Cebada; Rocío Angulo-Llanos; Ana Casado-Plasencia; Jaime Elízaga; Francisco Fernández Avilés Diáz Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2015-09-26
Authors: Jonathan R Spiro; Janet E Digby; Gopal Ghimire; Mark Mason; Andrew G Mitchell; Charles Ilsley; Ann Donald; Miles C D Dalby; Rajesh K Kharbanda Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Thomas H Schindler; Xiao-Li Zhang; Gabriella Vincenti; Leila Mhiri; René Lerch; Heinrich R Schelbert Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Praveen Shukla; Srinivas Ghatta; Nidhi Dubey; Caleb O Lemley; Mary Lynn Johnson; Amit Modgil; Kimberly Vonnahme; Joel S Caton; Lawrence P Reynolds; Chengwen Sun; Stephen T O'Rourke Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.733