Literature DB >> 21035869

A randomized controlled trial of alleviated positioning after small macular hole surgery.

Ramin Tadayoni1, Eric Vicaut, François Devin, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Jean-Paul Berrod, Yannick Le Mer, Jean-François Korobelnik, Mounir Aout, Pascale Massin, Alain Gaudric.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the success rate of surgery for small idiopathic macular holes (diameter, ≤ 400 μm) is significantly reduced if facedown positioning is replaced by simply taking care to avoid the supine position.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, parallel-assignment, open-label, interventional, multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-nine patients from 6 specialized vitreoretinal units, randomized into 2 parallel groups and followed up after surgery for 3 months.
METHODS: All patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy, peeling of any epiretinal membrane, and 17% C₂F₆ gas filling. Patients then were advised randomly to observe either strict facedown positioning for 22 of 24 hours or simply to avoid the supine position for 10 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the rate of anatomic closure 3 months after surgery. Main secondary measurements included Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity, progression of cataract, and frequency of complications.
RESULTS: The mean size of macular holes was approximately 300 μm in both groups. Closure rates were more than 90% in both groups: 32 (91.4%) of 34 eyes in the alleviated positioning group versus 32 (94.1%) of 35 eyes in the facedown positioning group (lower margin of 95% confidence interval of difference, -14.88%). The ETDRS scores at 3 months increased in both groups by 10.23 ± 14.64 and 10.52 ± 14.54 letters, respectively. Progression of cataract and the rate of other complications were not significantly different in the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of surgery for idiopathic macular holes of 400 μm or smaller is not significantly reduced if facedown positioning is replaced by simply taking care to avoid the supine position. These macular holes can be treated by streamlined surgery, that is, with no internal limiting membrane peeling and no facedown positioning (only avoidance of the supine position) with a closure rate of more than 90% and a mean gain in visual acuity of more than 2 ETDRS lines at 3 months.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21035869     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  21 in total

1.  Pilot randomised controlled trial of face-down posturing following phacovitrectomy for macular hole.

Authors:  D Yorston; M A R Siddiqui; M A Awan; S Walker; C Bunce; J W Bainbridge
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Glial proliferation after vitrectomy for a macular hole: a spectral domain optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Jaeryung Oh; Sun Mo Yang; Yong Min Choi; Seong-Woo Kim; Kuhl Huh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Determination of macular hole size in relation to individual variabilities of fovea morphology.

Authors:  J Y Shin; Y K Chu; Y T Hong; O W Kwon; S H Byeon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Quantitative biometry of zebrafish retinal vasculature using optical coherence tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Ivan Bozic; Xiaoyue Li; Yuankai Tao
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Predictive Model for Macular Hole Closure Speed: Insights From Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Justis P Ehlers; Atsuro Uchida; Sunil K Srivastava; Ming Hu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 6.  25th RCOphth Congress, President's Session paper: 25 years of progress in vitreoretinal surgery.

Authors:  G W Aylward
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Cost evaluation of surgical and pharmaceutical options in treatment for vitreomacular adhesions and macular holes.

Authors:  Jonathan S Chang; William E Smiddy
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  A review of current management of vitreomacular traction and macular hole.

Authors:  Alfredo García-Layana; José García-Arumí; José M Ruiz-Moreno; Lluís Arias-Barquet; Francisco Cabrera-López; Marta S Figueroa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Ramin Tadayoni; Ivana Svorenova; Ali Erginay; Alain Gaudric; Pascale Massin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial - a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Saruban Pasu; Catey Bunce; Richard Hooper; Ann Thomson; James Bainbridge
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.