Lisa I Iezzoni1, Elyse R Park, Kerry L Kilbridge. 1. Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA 02114, USA. liezzoni@partners.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among women with chronic, preexisting mobility impairments, we sought to explore how their mobility difficulties affected the diagnosis and treatment of early-stage breast cancer METHODS: This is a qualitative analysis of transcripts from in-depth in-person or telephone interviews with 20 English-speaking women who had early-stage breast cancer, were <60 years of age, and had chronic difficulty walking or used wheeled mobility aids at the time of their breast cancer diagnoses RESULTS: Nine women were disabled by polio as children or had postpolio syndrome, 3 had cerebral palsy, 3 had spinal cord injury, and 5 had other conditions. Most women reported difficulty obtaining mammograms, primarily because of inaccessible equipment, positioning problems, and difficulties with uncontrollable movements. Many women made decisions about surgical approach and chemotherapy by explicitly considering how various therapies would affect their arms, which are essential to their mobility (they use ambulation aids, self-propel manual wheelchairs, or otherwise rely on their arms for mobility or safety). Managing at home after surgery posed major mobility challenges, especially for women who lived alone. Several women reported feeling they suffered more chemotherapy side effects than do women without mobility problems. Weight gains with endocrine therapy compromised the mobility of several women. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing numbers of American women are living with mobility disabilities and entering age ranges with increased risks of breast cancer. Mobility impairments can affect women at every point during early-stage breast cancer diagnosis, therapy, and recovery. Clinicians must consider women's mobility functioning in making therapeutic recommendations to women with impaired mobility who develop breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Among women with chronic, preexisting mobility impairments, we sought to explore how their mobility difficulties affected the diagnosis and treatment of early-stage breast cancer METHODS: This is a qualitative analysis of transcripts from in-depth in-person or telephone interviews with 20 English-speaking women who had early-stage breast cancer, were <60 years of age, and had chronic difficulty walking or used wheeled mobility aids at the time of their breast cancer diagnoses RESULTS: Nine women were disabled by polio as children or had postpolio syndrome, 3 had cerebral palsy, 3 had spinal cord injury, and 5 had other conditions. Most women reported difficulty obtaining mammograms, primarily because of inaccessible equipment, positioning problems, and difficulties with uncontrollable movements. Many women made decisions about surgical approach and chemotherapy by explicitly considering how various therapies would affect their arms, which are essential to their mobility (they use ambulation aids, self-propel manual wheelchairs, or otherwise rely on their arms for mobility or safety). Managing at home after surgery posed major mobility challenges, especially for women who lived alone. Several women reported feeling they suffered more chemotherapy side effects than do women without mobility problems. Weight gains with endocrine therapy compromised the mobility of several women. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing numbers of American women are living with mobility disabilities and entering age ranges with increased risks of breast cancer. Mobility impairments can affect women at every point during early-stage breast cancer diagnosis, therapy, and recovery. Clinicians must consider women's mobility functioning in making therapeutic recommendations to women with impaired mobility who develop breast cancer.
Authors: P J Goodwin; M Ennis; K I Pritchard; D McCready; J Koo; S Sidlofsky; M Trudeau; N Hood; S Redwood Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Chan; J N Doctor; R F MacLehose; H Lawson; R A Rosenblatt; L M Baldwin; A Jha Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: W Demark-Wahnefried; B L Peterson; E P Winer; L Marks; N Aziz; P K Marcom; K Blackwell; B K Rimer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen B Edge; Karen Gold; Christine D Berg; Neal J Meropol; Theodore N Tsangaris; Luther Gray; Bert M Petersen; Yi-ting Hwang; Jeanne S Mandelblatt Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Laura M Newcomer; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Barry E Storer; Yutaka Yasui; Janet R Daling; John D Potter Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kelly B Smith; Lisa I Iezzoni; Kerry L Kilbridge; Hannah Pajolek; Katherine Ellicott Colson; Elyse R Park Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Megan A Morris; Allysha C Maragh-Bass; Joan M Griffin; Lila J Finney Rutten; Tara Lagu; Sean Phelan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Siran M Koroukian; Paul M Bakaki; Negar Golchin; Carl V Tyler; Cynthia Owusu; Sana Loue Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Susan Magasi; Jennifer Banas; Bruriah Horowitz; Judy Panko Reis; Kimberly The; Tom Wilson; David Victoson Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2019