Literature DB >> 21031002

The importance of new companies for drug discovery: origins of a decade of new drugs.

Robert Kneller1.   

Abstract

Understanding the factors that promote drug innovation is important both for improvements in health care and for the future of organizations engaged in drug discovery research and development. By identifying the inventors of 252 new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 1998 to 2007 and their places of work, and also classifying these drugs according to innovativeness, this study investigates the contribution of different types of organizations and regions to drug innovation during this period. The data indicate that drugs initially discovered in biotechnology companies or universities accounted for approximately half of the scientifically innovative drugs approved, as well as half of those that responded to unmet medical needs, although their contribution to the total number of new drugs was proportionately lower. The biotechnology companies were located mainly in the United States. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of these data and discusses potential contributing factors to the trends observed, with the aim of aiding efforts to promote drug innovation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21031002     DOI: 10.1038/nrd3251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov        ISSN: 1474-1776            Impact factor:   84.694


  12 in total

1.  Japan. Older scientists win majority of funding.

Authors:  Dennis Normile
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  2004 approvals: the demise of the blockbuster?

Authors:  Simon Frantz
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  National origins of new drugs.

Authors:  Robert Kneller
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Biotech drugs blaze a trail.

Authors:  Stacy Lawrence
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Pharma pursues novel models for academic collaboration.

Authors:  Bethan Hughes
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Rebuilding the R&D engine in big pharma.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Garnier
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2008-05

7.  Science education. And then there was one.

Authors:  Jeffrey Mervis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation.

Authors:  Bernard Munos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  A historical sketch of the discovery and development of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors.

Authors:  Andrea Savarino
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.206

10.  Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser (eds.), The Changing Governance of the Sciences. The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook: Springer, Dordrecht, 2007, 26 pp.

Authors:  Jürgen Enders
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2009-11-05
View more
  42 in total

1.  Bias in high-tier medical journals concerning physician-academic relationships with industry.

Authors:  Roman Lesko; Samuel Scott; Thomas P Stossel
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Longitudinal trends and subgroup analysis in publication patterns for preclinical data of newly approved drugs.

Authors:  Ursula Köster; Ingo Nolte; Martin C Michel
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Drug design and discovery: translational biomedical science varies among countries.

Authors:  Ian N Weaver; Donald F Weaver
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  US academic drug discovery.

Authors:  Stephen Frye; Marina Crosby; Teresa Edwards; Rudolph Juliano
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D.

Authors:  Fabio Pammolli; Laura Magazzini; Massimo Riccaboni
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Raising financing through strategic timing.

Authors:  Elicia Maine; V J Thomas
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  Why universities should step up in venture investing.

Authors:  Amanda Christini
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  The changing face of corporate venturing in biotechnology.

Authors:  Georg von Krogh; Boris Battistini; Fotini Pachidou; Pius Baschera
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Challenges and opportunities in the design of age-appropriate drug products.

Authors:  S Stegemann
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.281

10.  Playing well with others! Initiating and sustaining successful collaborations between industry, academia and government.

Authors:  Craig J Thomas; John C McKew
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.