| Literature DB >> 21030439 |
Prabodhika R Mallikaratchy1, Alessandro Ruggiero, Jeffrey R Gardner, Vitaly Kuryavyi, William F Maguire, Mark L Heaney, Michael R McDevitt, Dinshaw J Patel, David A Scheinberg.
Abstract
Long-term survival still eludes most patients with leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. No approved therapies target the hallmark of the B cell, its mIgM, also known as the B-cell receptor (BCR). Aptamers are small oligonucleotides that can specifically bind to a wide range of target molecules and offer some advantages over antibodies as therapeutic agents. Here, we report the rational engineering of aptamer TD05 into multimeric forms reactive with the BCR that may be useful in biomedical applications. Systematic truncation of TD05 coupled with modification with locked nucleic acids (LNA) increased conformational stability and nuclease resistance. Trimeric and tetrameric versions with optimized polyethyleneglycol (PEG) linker lengths exhibited high avidity at physiological temperatures both in vitro and in vivo. Competition and protease studies showed that the multimeric, optimized aptamer bound to membrane-associated human mIgM, but not with soluble IgM in plasma, allowing the possibility of targeting leukemias and lymphomas in vivo. The B-cell specificity of the multivalent aptamer was confirmed on lymphoma cell lines and fresh clinical leukemia samples. The chemically engineered aptamers, with significantly improved kinetic and biochemical features, unique specificity and desirable pharmacological properties, may be useful in biomedical applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21030439 PMCID: PMC3064813 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res ISSN: 0305-1048 Impact factor: 16.971
Figure 1.Optimization of monomeric and multimeric scaffolds and their Bmax/2 (Kd′) at 37°C (top number) and at 4°C (bottom number). (A) original TD05 sequence. (B) Truncated TD05.1. (C) LNA modified TD05.1 (TD05.17). (D) Bivalent TD05.17 (L-BVA.8S). (E) Trivalent TD05.17 (L-TVA.8S). (F) Tetravalent TD05.17 (L-TetVA.8S). The constructs were synthesized with PEG at the 5′- and 3′-ends; Cy3 or FITC was added at the 5′-end. Red = LNA bases.
Modifications of TD05 alter binding at 4°C
| Name | Deletions/changes | Bmax/2 at 4°C (nM) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TD05 | A | ACCGTGGAGGATAGTTCGGTGGCTGTTCAG GGTCTCCTCCACGGT | 359 |
| TD05.7 | XXCGTGGAGGATAGTTCGGTGGCTTCAGGGTCTCCTCCCGXX | 148 | |
| TD05.1 | B | XXXXXAGGAG GATAGTTCGGTG GCTGTTCAG GGTCTCCTCCTXXXXX | 53 |
| TD05.10 | GGAGGA | >1000 | |
| TD05.11 | GGAGGATAGTTCGGT | >1000 | |
| TD05.12 | GGAGGATAGTTCGGTGGCTGT | >1000 | |
| TD05.16 | | 368 | |
| TD05.17 | C | AGGAGGATAGTTCGGTGGCTGTTCAGGGTCTCC | 43 |
| TD05.18 | | 819 |
= LNA; italic, bold = 2′OMe substituted nucleotides; X = deletions.
Optimization of linker length and linear assembly of TD05.1
| Name | Structure in | Sequence | Bmax/2@37°C (nM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TD05.1 | B | AGGAG GATAGTTCGGTG GCTGTTCAG GGTCTCCTCCT | >10 000 |
| BV.6S | TD05.1 -(sp18)6 - TD05.1 | >10 000 | |
| BV.8S | TD05.1 -(sp18)8 - TD05.1 | >10 000 | |
| BV.12S | TD05.1 -(sp18)12 - TD05.1 | >10 000 | |
| BV.16S | TD05.1 -(sp18)16- TD05.1 | 2030 | |
| TVA.8S | TD05.1 -(sp18)8 - TD05.1 -(sp18)8 - TD05.1 | 490 | |
| TetVA.8S | TD05.1 -(sp18)8 - TD05.1 -(sp18)8 - TD05.1-(sp18)8 - TD05.1 | 425 | |
| TD05.17 | C | AGGAGGATAGTTCGGTGGCTGTTCAGGGTCTCC | >10 000 |
| L-BVA.8S | D | FITC-sp18-TD05.17-(sp18)8 - TD05.17-sp18 | 6222 |
| L-TVA.8S | E | Cy3-Sp18-TD05.17 -(sp18)8 - TD05.17 -(sp18)8 - TD05.17-Sp18 | 256 |
| L-TetVA.8S | F | Cy3-sp18-TD05.17-(sp18)8-TD05.17-(sp18)8-TD05.17-(sp18)8-TD05.17-sp18 | 272 |
= LNA; Sp18 = spacer 18.
Figure 2.Analysis of nuclease stability of L-TVA.8S in human serum at physiological temperature. Aptamers were separated using poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis and fluorescence intensity of full-length DNA/area (mm2) was plotted as a function of time (hours).
Analysis of specificity of dimeric aptamers with cultured cells and clinical samples
| Cell line | Cell type | Bivalent aptamer (structure D) staining |
|---|---|---|
| Ramos | B-Lymphoma, Burkitt’s IgM+ | + |
| SKLY-16 | B-lymphoma IgM+ | + |
| Daudi | B-lymphoma IgM+ | + |
| Raji | B-lymphoma, Burkitt’s IgM+ | − |
| Jeko | Mantle cell lymphoma (B) | − |
| Bjab | B-Lymphoid leukemia | − |
| SKLY 18 | B-lymphoma IgM- | − |
| AL67 | Mouse fibroblast | − |
| CRW22R | Prostate cancer | − |
| H5V | Endothelial cell lines (heart) | − |
| HCT116 | Carcinoma colon | − |
| HEK293 | Human embryonic kidney | − |
| HeLa | Human adenocarcinoma (cervical) | − |
| K-562 | Leukemia, chronic myelogenous | − |
| MOLT | T-Leukemia, acute lymphoblastic | − |
| SKOV-3 | Ovarian | − |
| HL60 | Leukemia, acute promyelocytic | − |
| Jurkat | T-Leukemia, acute | − |
| CML | Clinical sample | − |
| CLL | Clinical samples | + |
| HCL | Clinical sample | + |
| Normal B cells | Donors | +/− |
| Normal T cells | Donors | − |
aMedian of the fluorescence intensity of FITC-labeled aptamer/ median of the fluorescence intensity of FITC-labeled random sequence ≥2.0 equals positive (+).
Experiments were done at 4°C.
bVariable binding to Daudi was observed.
cOne sample. CML is chronic myeloid leukemia, a non-B-cell neoplasm.
dFourteen samples; CLL is B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia; in two of the samples, the gated CD19-negative population showed positive signal with the aptamer
eOne sample. HCL is hairy cell leukemia, a B-cell neoplasm.
fNine samples; five of the normal B-cell samples were negative and three were only weakly positive.
gTwenty-three samples; a small subpopulation of one of the normal T-cell samples was weakly positive.
Figure 3.Binding of LNA-modified bivalent aptamer binding with B cells and T cells. (Upper left) Bivalent aptamer binding to CD19-positive B cells. (Upper right) Bivalent aptamer does not bind to CD3-positive, CD19-negative cells. (Lower left) Bivalent randomized control aptamer does not bind to CD19-positive cells. (Lower right) Bivalent randomized aptamer does not bind to CD3-positive cells.
Figure 4.Binding of TD05.1 to mIgM after trypsin treatment. Cells were treated with trypsin for 40 min and binding of FITC-labeled (A) TD05.1, (B) anti-CD20 and (C) anti-IgM antibody was evaluated and compared with untreated control.
Figure 5.Binding of aptamer in the presence of soluble IgM or human serum. The FITC-labeled monomeric and tetrameric aptamer was incubated with Ramos cells in the presence of soluble IgM/human serum for 30 min, and subsequently washed and binding was analyzed using flow cytometry. (A) Positive control showing blocking of anti-IgM by serum or soluble IgM. (B) Monomeric aptamer binding is not affected when serum or excess soluble IgM is present. (C) Tetrameric aptamer binding is not significantly affected when serum and excess soluble IgM is present.
Figure 6.Binding of TetVA.8S with Ramos cells in the intraperitoneal cavity. 1 µM of either TetVA.8S or random DNA in saline was injected into intraperitoneal cavity. Ramos cells were withdrawn from the intraperitoneal cavity and co-stained with control (BSA alone), cy5-labeled anti-IgM antibody or APC-labeled anti-CD19. (A) FITC-random sequence injected i.p. (ex vivo BSA control). (B) FITC-random sequence injected i.p.; co-stained with anti-CD19. (C) FITC-random injected i.p.; co-stained with anti-IgM. (D) FITC-TetVA.8S injected i.p. (ex vivo BSA control). (E) FITC-TetVA.8S injected i.p.; co-stained with anti-CD19, F: FITC-TetVA.8S injected i.p.; co-stained with cy-5-anti-IgM.