Literature DB >> 21029183

Ultrafine particle concentrations and exposures in seven residences in northern California.

S Bhangar1, N A Mullen, S V Hering, N M Kreisberg, W W Nazaroff.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Human exposures to ultrafine particles (UFP) are poorly characterized given the potential associated health risks. Residences are important sites of exposure. To characterize residential exposures to UFP in some circumstances and to investigate governing factors, seven single-family houses in California were studied during 2007-2009. During multiday periods, time-resolved particle number concentrations were monitored indoors and outdoors and information was acquired concerning occupancy, source-related activities, and building operation. On average, occupants were home for 70% of their time. The geometric mean time-average residential exposure concentration for 21 study subjects was 14,500 particles per cm(3) (GSD = 1.8; arithmetic mean ± standard deviation = 17,000 ± 10,300 particles per cm(3)). The average contribution to residential exposures from indoor episodic sources was 150% of the contribution from particles of outdoor origin. Unvented natural-gas pilot lights contributed up to 19% to exposure for the two households where present. Episodic indoor source activities, most notably cooking, caused the highest peak exposures and most of the variation in exposure among houses. Owing to the importance of indoor sources and variations in the infiltration factor, residential exposure to UFP cannot be characterized by ambient measurements alone. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Indoor and outdoor sources each contribute to residential ultrafine particle (UFP) concentrations and exposures. Under the conditions investigated, peak exposure concentrations indoors were associated with cooking, using candles, or the use of a furnace. Active particle removal systems can mitigate exposure by reducing the persistence of particles indoors. Eliminating the use of unvented gas pilot lights on cooking appliances could also be beneficial. The study results indicate that characterization of human exposure to UFP, an air pollutant of emerging public health concern, cannot be accomplished without a good understanding of conditions inside residences.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029183     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00689.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  16 in total

1.  Emission characteristics of air pollutants from incense and candle burning in indoor atmospheres.

Authors:  A Manoukian; E Quivet; B Temime-Roussel; M Nicolas; F Maupetit; H Wortham
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Quantification of the impact of cooking processes on indoor concentrations of volatile organic species and primary and secondary organic aerosols.

Authors:  Felix Klein; Urs Baltensperger; André S H Prévôt; Imad El Haddad
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 3.  Cooking oil fumes and lung cancer: a review of the literature in the context of the U.S. population.

Authors:  Trevor Lee; Francesca Gany
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-06

4.  Wildfire smoke impacts on indoor air quality assessed using crowdsourced data in California.

Authors:  Yutong Liang; Deep Sengupta; Mark J Campmier; David M Lunderberg; Joshua S Apte; Allen H Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Indoor and outdoor measurements of particle number concentration in near-highway homes.

Authors:  Christina H Fuller; Doug Brugge; Paige L Williams; Murray A Mittleman; Kevin Lane; John L Durant; John D Spengler
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Effect of time-activity adjustment on exposure assessment for traffic-related ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Kevin J Lane; Jonathan I Levy; Madeleine Kangsen Scammell; Allison P Patton; John L Durant; Mkaya Mwamburi; Wig Zamore; Doug Brugge
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Vascular and lung function related to ultrafine and fine particles exposure assessed by personal and indoor monitoring: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yulia Olsen; Dorina Gabriela Karottki; Ditte Marie Jensen; Gabriel Bekö; Birthe Uldahl Kjeldsen; Geo Clausen; Lars-Georg Hersoug; Gitte Juel Holst; Aneta Wierzbicka; Torben Sigsgaard; Allan Linneberg; Peter Møller; Steffen Loft
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Indoor and outdoor exposure to ultrafine, fine and microbiologically derived particulate matter related to cardiovascular and respiratory effects in a panel of elderly urban citizens.

Authors:  Dorina Gabriela Karottki; Michal Spilak; Marie Frederiksen; Zorana Jovanovic Andersen; Anne Mette Madsen; Matthias Ketzel; Andreas Massling; Lars Gunnarsen; Peter Møller; Steffen Loft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Lessons from in-home air filtration intervention trials to reduce urban ultrafine particle number concentrations.

Authors:  Doug Brugge; Matthew C Simon; Neelakshi Hudda; Marisa Zellmer; Laura Corlin; Stephanie Cleland; Eda Yiqi Lu; Sonja Rivera; Megan Byrne; Mei Chung; John L Durant
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 6.456

10.  An indoor air filtration study in homes of elderly: cardiovascular and respiratory effects of exposure to particulate matter.

Authors:  Dorina Gabriela Karottki; Michal Spilak; Marie Frederiksen; Lars Gunnarsen; Elvira Vaclavik Brauner; Barbara Kolarik; Zorana Jovanovic Andersen; Torben Sigsgaard; Lars Barregard; Bo Strandberg; Gerd Sallsten; Peter Møller; Steffen Loft
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.