Literature DB >> 21029135

Advanced image fusion to overlay coronary sinus anatomy with real-time fluoroscopy to facilitate left ventricular lead implantation in CRT.

Simon G Duckett1, Matthew R Ginks, Benjamin R Knowles, Yingliang Ma, Anoop Shetty, Julian Bostock, Michael Cooklin, Jas S Gill, Gerry S Carr-White, Reza Razavi, Tobias Schaeffter, Kawal S Rhode, C Aldo Rinaldi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure rate for left ventricular (LV) lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is up to 12%. The use of segmentation tools, advanced image registration software, and high-fidelity images from computerized tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) of the coronary sinus (CS) can guide LV lead implantation. We evaluated the feasibility of advanced image registration onto live fluoroscopic images to allow successful LV lead placement.
METHODS: Twelve patients (11 male, 59 ± 16.8 years) undergoing CRT had three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart imaging (six CT, six CMR). Eight patients had at least one previously failed LV lead implant. Using segmentation software, anatomical models of the cardiac chambers, CS, and its branches were overlaid onto the live fluoroscopy using a prototype version of the Philips EP Navigator software to guide lead implantation.
RESULTS: We achieved high-fidelity segmentations of cardiac chambers, coronary vein anatomy, and accurate registration between the 3D anatomical models and the live fluoroscopy in all 12 patients confirmed by balloon occlusion angiography. The CS was cannulated successfully in every patient and in 11, an LV lead was implanted successfully. (One patient had no acceptable lead values due to extensive myocardial scar).
CONCLUSION: Using overlaid 3D segmentations of the CS and cardiac chambers, it is feasible to guide CRT implantation in real time by fusing advanced imaging and fluoroscopy. This enabled successful CRT in a group of patients with previously failed implants. This technology has the potential to facilitate CRT and improve implant success. ©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029135     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02940.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Bas L van der Hoeven; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Three-dimensional rotational venography of the coronary sinus tree facilitates left ventricular lead implantation for CRT.

Authors:  Jan Kaufmann; Jin-Hong Gerds-Li; Charalampos Kriatselis; Eckart Fleck; Stephan Goetze
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Preprocedural imaging for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

Authors:  Wai-ee Thai; Bryan Wai; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Localization of pacing and defibrillator leads using standard x-ray views is frequently inaccurate and is not reproducible.

Authors:  Larry R Jackson; Jonathan P Piccini; James P Daubert; Lynne M Hurwitz Koweek; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Postprocedure mapping of cardiac resynchronization lead position using standard fluoroscopy systems: implications for the nonresponder with scar.

Authors:  Katherine M Parker; Ethan Bunting; Rohit Malhotra; Samantha A Clarke; Pamela Mason; Andrew E Darby; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno; Jeffrey W Holmes; Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 6.  An Overview on Image Registration Techniques for Cardiac Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Azira Khalil; Siew-Cheok Ng; Yih Miin Liew; Khin Wee Lai
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: where are we today?

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Rene M Botnar; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.931

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.