Literature DB >> 21029031

Toxicological effects of emission particles from fossil- and biodiesel-fueled diesel engine with and without DOC/POC catalytic converter.

Pasi I Jalava1, Maija Tapanainen, Kari Kuuspalo, Ari Markkanen, Pasi Hakulinen, Mikko S Happo, Arto S Pennanen, Mika Ihalainen, Pasi Yli-Pirilä, Ulla Makkonen, Kimmo Teinilä, Jorma Mäki-Paakkanen, Raimo O Salonen, Jorma Jokiniemi, Maija-Riitta Hirvonen.   

Abstract

There is increasing demand for renewable energy and the use of biodiesel in traffic is a major option when implying this increment. We investigated the toxicological activities of particulate emissions from a nonroad diesel engine, operated with conventional diesel fuel (EN590), and two biodiesels: rapeseed methyl ester (RME) and hydrotreated fresh vegetable oil (HVO). The engine was operated with all fuels either with or without catalyst (DOC/POC). The particulate matter (PM(1)) samples were collected from the dilution tunnel with a high-volume cascade impactor (HVCI). These samples were characterized for ions, elements, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds. Mouse RAW264.7 macrophages were exposed to the PM samples for 24 h. Inflammatory mediators, (TNF-α and MIP-2), cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and oxidative stress (reactive oxygen species [ROS]) were measured. All the samples displayed mostly dose-dependent toxicological activity. EN590 and HVO emission particles had larger inflammatory responses than RME-derived particles. The catalyst somewhat increased the responses per the same mass unit. There were no substantial differences in the cytotoxic responses between the fuels or catalyst use. Genotoxic responses by all the particulate samples were at same level, except weaker for the RME sample with catalyst. Unlike other samples, EN590-derived particles did not significantly increase ROS production. Catalyst increased the oxidative potential of the EN590 and HVO-derived particles, but decreased that with RME. Overall, the use of biodiesel fuels and catalyst decreased the particulate mass emissions compared with the EN590 fuel. Similar studies with different types of diesel engines are needed to assess the potential benefits from biofuel use in engines with modern technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029031     DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2010.519009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  19 in total

1.  Aerosols and criteria gases in an underground mine that uses FAME biodiesel blends.

Authors:  Aleksandar D Bugarski; Samuel J Janisko; Emanuele G Cauda; Larry D Patts; Jon A Hummer; Charles Westover; Troy Terrillion
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-07-24

2.  Soy biodiesel and petrodiesel emissions differ in size, chemical composition and stimulation of inflammatory responses in cells and animals.

Authors:  Naomi K Fukagawa; Muyao Li; Matthew E Poynter; Brian C Palmer; Erin Parker; John Kasumba; Britt A Holmén
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Petrodiesel and Waste Grease Biodiesel (B20) Emission Particles at a Rural Recycling Center: Characterization and Effects on Lung Epithelial Cells and Macrophages.

Authors:  Nora Traviss; Muyao Li; Melissa Lombard; Brett Amy Thelen; Brian C Palmer; Matthew E Poynter; Brooke T Mossman; Britt A Holmén; Naomi K Fukagawa
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.763

4.  Inhalation of hydrogenated vegetable oil combustion exhaust and genotoxicity responses in humans.

Authors:  Rebecca Harnung Scholten; Yona J Essig; Martin Roursgaard; Annie Jensen; Annette M Krais; Louise Gren; Katrin Dierschke; Anders Gudmundsson; Aneta Wierzbicka; Peter Møller
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Breathing easier? The known impacts of biodiesel on air quality.

Authors:  Nora Traviss
Journal:  Biofuels       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.956

6.  Diesel and biodiesel exhaust particle effects on rat alveolar macrophages with in vitro exposure.

Authors:  Laya Bhavaraju; Jonathan Shannahan; Aaron William; Robert McCormick; John McGee; Urmila Kodavanti; Michael Madden
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 7.  Potential hazards associated with combustion of bio-derived versus petroleum-derived diesel fuel.

Authors:  Jürgen Bünger; Jürgen Krahl; Olaf Schröder; Lasse Schmidt; Götz A Westphal
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.635

8.  Toxicological properties of emission particles from heavy duty engines powered by conventional and bio-based diesel fuels and compressed natural gas.

Authors:  Pasi I Jalava; Päivi Aakko-Saksa; Timo Murtonen; Mikko S Happo; Ari Markkanen; Pasi Yli-Pirilä; Pasi Hakulinen; Risto Hillamo; Jorma Mäki-Paakkanen; Raimo O Salonen; Jorma Jokiniemi; Maija-Riitta Hirvonen
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 9.  Inflammation-related effects of diesel engine exhaust particles: studies on lung cells in vitro.

Authors:  P E Schwarze; A I Totlandsdal; M Låg; M Refsnes; J A Holme; J Øvrevik
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Acute cardiovascular effects of controlled exposure to dilute Petrodiesel and biodiesel exhaust in healthy volunteers: a crossover study.

Authors:  Jon Unosson; Mikael Kabéle; Christoffer Boman; Robin Nyström; Ioannis Sadiktsis; Roger Westerholm; Ian S Mudway; Esme Purdie; Jennifer Raftis; Mark R Miller; Nicholas L Mills; David E Newby; Anders Blomberg; Thomas Sandström; Jenny A Bosson
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.