| Literature DB >> 34127003 |
Jon Unosson1,2, Mikael Kabéle1, Christoffer Boman3, Robin Nyström3, Ioannis Sadiktsis4, Roger Westerholm4, Ian S Mudway5, Esme Purdie5, Jennifer Raftis6, Mark R Miller7, Nicholas L Mills7,8, David E Newby7, Anders Blomberg1, Thomas Sandström9,10, Jenny A Bosson1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Air pollution derived from combustion is associated with considerable cardiorespiratory morbidity and mortality in addition to environmental effects. Replacing petrodiesel with biodiesel may have ecological benefits, but impacts on human health remain unquantified. The objective was to compare acute cardiovascular effects of blended and pure biodiesel exhaust exposure against known adverse effects of petrodiesel exhaust (PDE) exposure in human subjects. In two randomized controlled double-blind crossover studies, healthy volunteers were exposed to PDE or biodiesel exhaust for one hour. In study one, 16 subjects were exposed, on separate occasions, to PDE and 30% rapeseed methyl ester biodiesel blend (RME30) exhaust, aiming at PM10 300 μg/m3. In study two, 19 male subjects were separately exposed to PDE and exhaust from a 100% RME fuel (RME100) using similar engine load and exhaust dilution. Generated exhaust was analyzed for physicochemical composition and oxidative potential. Following exposure, vascular endothelial function was assessed using forearm venous occlusion plethysmography and ex vivo thrombus formation was assessed using a Badimon chamber model of acute arterial injury. Biomarkers of inflammation, platelet activation and fibrinolysis were measured in the blood.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; Biodiesel; Cardiovascular system; Diesel; Endothelial function; Particulate matter; Thrombosis; Vascular function; Vasomotor dysfunction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34127003 PMCID: PMC8204543 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-021-00412-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Subject characteristics
| Parameter | Study one, | Study two, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 (21–29) | 28 (20–38) | |||
Males: 181 (173–195) Females: 171 (166–176.5) | 181 (168–190) | |||
Males: 75 (67–88) Females: 69 (60–79) | 79 (55–97) | |||
Males: 23 (20–25) Females: 23 (21–25) | 24 (19–29) | |||
| 5.8 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.3 | |
| 4.6 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | |
| 12 ± 1 | 11 ± 1 | 13 ± 1 | 15 ± 2 | |
| 121 ± 3 | 123 ± 2 | 136 ± 3 | 135 ± 3 | |
| 69 ± 1 | 71 ± 1 | 79 ± 2 | 78 ± 2 | |
| 65 ± 2 | 64 ± 2 | 68 ± 2 | 67 ± 2 | |
| 148 ± 3 | 147 ± 3 | 151 ± 2 | 151 ± 2 | |
| 5.7 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.3 | |
| 231 ± 11 | 236 ± 11 | 232 ± 11 | 230 ± 10 | |
| 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | |
| 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | |
| 2.9 ± 0.2 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | |
Median and range for anthropomorphic measures. Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for pre-exposure baseline cardiorespiratory and hematological measures
Exposure characteristics
| Study one | Study two | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrodiesel | RME30 | Petrodiesel | RME100 | |
| 314 ± 27 | 309 ± 30 | 310 ± 34 | 165 ± 16 | |
| 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | |
| 3.9 ± 1.0 | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 6.1 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.5 | |
| 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |
| 22 ± 1 | 22 ± 1 | 22 ± 2 | 22 ± 1 | |
| 36 ± 13 | 33 ± 11 | 28 ± 11 | 30 ± 13 | |
| n/a | n/a | 1.7 ± 3.2 | 2.2 ± 1.4 | |
| 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | n/d | 0.43 ± 0.03 | |
| 156 ± 16 | 127 ± 15 | n/d | 76 ± 24 | |
| 244 ± 81 | 158 ± 37 | n/d | 225 ± 167 | |
Exposure characteristics, mean and standard deviation. *Elemental (EC) and organic (OC) carbon. Semi-volatile PAHs are the sum of; phenanthrene, anthracene, 3-methylphenanthrene, 2-methylphenanthrene, 2-methylanthracene, 9-methylphenanthrene, 1-methylphenanthrene, 4H-cyclopenta [def] phenanthrene, 2-phenylnaphthalene, 3,6-dimethylphenanthrene, 3,9-dimethylphenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, 2-methylpyrene, 4-methylpyrene, 1-methylpyrene, benz [a] anthracene, and chrysene. For Study one n = 16 and for study two n = 19, except EC/OC and PAHs n = 3 for studies one and two
Fig. 1Particle size distribution during PDE and RME100 exhaust exposure. Mean with standard deviation. Exposures were kept constant and measurements (n = 3) were spread out over the exposure series
Fig. 2Oxidative potential and metal content of exhaust PM derived from petrol diesel and RME blended fuel combustion. Panel a shows superoxide free radical generation using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) with the spin-trap Tempone-H (1 mM). All particulates were suspended at an equivalent concentration of 0.1 mg/mL in physiological saline. Pyrogallol (0.1 mM) is used as a positive control to spontaneously generate superoxide. RME100 generated significantly less superoxide than petrodiesel (*p < 0.05) or RME30 (†p < 0.05) (unpaired t-tests, n = 6–10). Panel b represents ascorbate- and glutathione-dependent oxidative potentials (OPAA and OPGSH, respectively) for the PM < 0.2 μm and PM0.2–0.5 μm fractions are illustrated, with the data expressed per μg of extracted PM (n = 3, separate filters, per fraction and fuel type). A total aggregated OP (OPTOT) is also illustrated reflecting the sum of the OPAA and OPGSH measures. Data are illustrated as means with standard deviation, with comparison between groups performed on the sum of the OP for the two fractions combined using the students t-test (P < 0.05): ‘a’ petrol diesel vs, RME30; ‘b’ RME30 vs RME100; no significant differences were observed between petrol diesel and RME100. Panel c represents the concentration of a selection of the measured metals in both PM fractions derived from each fuel type (n = 3). Zn = zinc, Cr = Chromium, V = Vanadium, Mn = Manganese, Cu = Copper, Mo = Molybdenum, Ni = Nickel, Fe = Iron. Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.05) in concentration relative to petrodiesel. No significant differences were noted between the fuel types in the PM < 0.2 μm fraction and metal concentrations did not differ between the two fractions under each condition
Fig. 3Forearm blood flow during intrabrachial infusion of vasoactive drugs 4–6 h post exposure, mL/100 mL tissue. Mean with 95% CI. The graph shows response to incremental doses of acetylcholine, bradykinin, sodium nitroprusside and verapamil following respective exposure. All vasodilators caused an increase in blood flow (p < 0.05 for all) that was similar between exhaust exposures (p > 0.05 for all). P values in the graph for respective vasodilator response in the infused arm following exposure to RME30 exhaust compared to PDE (n = 15) and RME100 exhaust compared to PDE (n = 18), 2-way ANOVA
Fig. 4Ex vivo thrombosis formation in a model of acute arterial injury. Individual data points for mean thrombus area for each individual, line for group mean with 95% CI. There were no significant differences between RME30 and PDE (study one) or RME100 and PDE (study two) RME30 vs. PDE p = 0.37, n = 13 and RME100 vs. PDE p = 0.48, n = 19. P values from paired Student’s t-test
Fig. 5Mean plasma t-PA antigen concentrations after exposure to petrodiesel vs. RME 30 (upper left panel) and petrodiesel vs. RME100 (lower left panel) were not significantly different between exposures (p = 0.73 and p = 0.22, respectively). Stimulated release of t-PA plasma antigen concentrations following incremental doses of bradykinin infusions, expressed as nanogram per 100 mL tissue per minute, mean with 95% CI (upper and lower right panels). Bradykinin infusions caused dose dependent increases in t-PA antigen concentrations that were significant at p < 0.01 level for all exposures; petrodiesel and RME 30 (upper right panel) as well as petrodiesel and RME 100 (lower right panel) by 2-way ANOVA. The bradykinin stimulated increases in t-PA did not differ between petrodiesel or RME exposures (p = 0.43 and p = 0.35, respectively).