Literature DB >> 21028918

Strategies to prevent cellular rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

Susan W Denfield1.   

Abstract

Despite more than 40 years' experience in pediatric heart transplantation, cellular rejection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In this review, strategies and agents to prevent acute cellular rejection are discussed. Strategies to prevent rejection are divided into two phases - induction and maintenance therapies. Currently, the most commonly used induction agents are polyclonal antibodies (rabbit or equine antithymocyte globulin) and interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (daclizumab or basiliximab). Induction therapies have reduced early rejection, are renal sparing, and can reduce corticosteroid exposure, but have not yet been shown to have a longer term survival benefit. Multiple maintenance immunosuppressants are available. Nearly all regimens include a calcineurin inhibitor (either ciclosporin [cyclosporine] or tacrolimus). Most combinations in pediatric heart transplantation include an antiproliferative agent (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or, less commonly, sirolimus). Everolimus has seen increasing use in adult heart transplant patients in Europe but, to date, its use is rare in pediatric heart transplantation. The use of corticosteroids as a third agent is still common, but strategies to avoid or minimize their use are increasing. The 'best' combination of therapies varies between studies. By gaining a better understanding of individuals' genetic and environmental risk factors, we may in the future be able to better predict the course of cardiac allografts and enhance our ability to tailor immunosuppression to individual patient variables with the ultimate goal of inducing a state of immune tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21028918     DOI: 10.2165/11535990-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Drugs        ISSN: 1174-5878            Impact factor:   3.022


  70 in total

1.  A randomized, double-blinded comparison of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam for induction immunosuppressive therapy in adult renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  D C Brennan; K Flavin; J A Lowell; T K Howard; S Shenoy; S Burgess; S Dolan; J M Kano; M Mahon; M A Schnitzler; R Woodward; W Irish; G G Singer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Risk factors for recurrent rejection in pediatric heart transplantation: a multicenter experience.

Authors:  Clifford Chin; David C Naftel; Tajinder P Singh; Elizabeth D Blume; Helen Luikart; Daniel Bernstein; Pat Gamberg; James K Kirklin; W Robert Morrow
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 3.  Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: tenth official pediatric heart transplantation report--2007.

Authors:  Mark M Boucek; Paul Aurora; Leah B Edwards; David O Taylor; Elbert P Trulock; Jason Christie; Fabienne Dobbels; Axel O Rahmel; Berkeley M Keck; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Induction therapy for pediatric and adult heart transplantation: comparison between OKT3 and daclizumab.

Authors:  Clifford Chin; Sky Pittson; Helen Luikart; Daniel Bernstein; Robert Robbins; Bruce Reitz; Phillip Oyer; Hannah Valantine
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Three-year results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in cardiac transplant recipients.

Authors:  Howard J Eisen; Jon Kobashigawa; Anne Keogh; Robert Bourge; Dale Renlund; Robert Mentzer; Edwin Alderman; Hannah Valantine; Georges Dureau; Donna Mancini; Richard Mamelok; Robert Gordon; Whedy Wang; Mandeep Mehra; Maria Rosa Constanzo; Manfred Hummel; Jay Johnson
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Prevention of rejection in cardiac transplantation by blockade of the interleukin-2 receptor with a monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  A Beniaminovitz; S Itescu; K Lietz; M Donovan; E M Burke; B D Groff; N Edwards; D M Mancini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine microemulsion for heart transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Ye; Xiao Ying-Bin; Weng Yu-Guo; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Multicenter trial of everolimus in pediatric renal transplant recipients: results at three year.

Authors:  Robert Ettenger; Peter-Friedrich Hoyer; Paul Grimm; Nicholas Webb; Chantal Loirat; John D Mahan; Mark Mentser; Patrick Niaudet; Gisela Offner; R Vandamme-Lombaerts; J Mark Hexham
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2008-06

9.  Pediatric post-transplant diffuse large B cell lymphoma after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Shigenori Kusuki; Yoshiko Hashii; Norihide Fukushima; Sachiko Takizawa; Sadao Tokimasa; Shigetoyo Kogaki; Hideaki Ohta; Etsuko Tsuda; Atsuko Nakagawa; Keiichi Ozono
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.490

10.  Low-dose tacrolimus/sirolimus and steroid withdrawal in heart recipients is highly efficacious.

Authors:  Bruno Meiser; Ingo Kaczmarek; M Mueller; Jan Groetzner; Michael Weis; Andreas Knez; Hans-Ullrich Stempfle; Volker Klauss; Michael Schmoeckel; Bruno Reichart; Peter Ueberfuhr
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Everolimus in heart transplantation: an update.

Authors:  Stephan W Hirt; Christoph Bara; Markus J Barten; Tobias Deuse; Andreas O Doesch; Ingo Kaczmarek; Uwe Schulz; Jörg Stypmann; Assad Haneya; Hans B Lehmkuhl
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2013-12-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.