BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Thymoglobulin (a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody) to Atgam (a horse-derived polyclonal antibody) for induction in adult renal transplant recipients. METHODS:Transplant recipients (n=72) were randomized 2:1 in a double-blinded fashion to receive Thymoglobulin (n=48) at 1.5 mg/kg intravenously or Atgam (n=24) at 15 mg/kg intravenously, intraoperatively, then daily for at least 6 days. Recipients were observed for at least 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: By 1 year after transplantation, 4% of Thymoglobulin-treated patients experienced acute rejection compared with 25% of Atgam-treated patients (P=0.014). The rate of acute rejection was lower with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (relative risk=0.09; P=0.009). Rejection was less severe with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (P=0.02). No recurrent rejection occurred with Thymoglobulin compared with 33% with Atgam (P=NS). Patient survival was not different, but the composite end point of freedom from death, graft loss, or rejection, the "event-free survival," was superior with Thymoglobulin (94%) compared with Atgam (63%; P=0.0005). Fewer adverse events occurred with Thymoglobulin (P=0.013). Leukopenia was more common with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (56% vs. 4%; P<0.0001) during induction. The mean absolute lymphocyte count remained below baseline with Thymoglobulin throughout the study (P<0.007), but with Atgam, significant lymphocyte reductions occurred only at day 7. The incidence of cytomegalovirus disease was less with Thymoglobulin than Atgam at 6 months (10% vs. 33%; P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Brief (7-day) induction with Thymoglobulin resulted in less frequent and less severe rejection, a better event-free survival, less cytomegalovirus disease, fewer serious adverse events, but more frequent early leukopenia than induction with Atgam. These results may in fact be explained by a more profound and durable beneficial lymphopenia.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Thymoglobulin (a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody) to Atgam (a horse-derived polyclonal antibody) for induction in adult renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Transplant recipients (n=72) were randomized 2:1 in a double-blinded fashion to receive Thymoglobulin (n=48) at 1.5 mg/kg intravenously or Atgam (n=24) at 15 mg/kg intravenously, intraoperatively, then daily for at least 6 days. Recipients were observed for at least 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: By 1 year after transplantation, 4% of Thymoglobulin-treated patients experienced acute rejection compared with 25% of Atgam-treated patients (P=0.014). The rate of acute rejection was lower with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (relative risk=0.09; P=0.009). Rejection was less severe with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (P=0.02). No recurrent rejection occurred with Thymoglobulin compared with 33% with Atgam (P=NS). Patient survival was not different, but the composite end point of freedom from death, graft loss, or rejection, the "event-free survival," was superior with Thymoglobulin (94%) compared with Atgam (63%; P=0.0005). Fewer adverse events occurred with Thymoglobulin (P=0.013). Leukopenia was more common with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (56% vs. 4%; P<0.0001) during induction. The mean absolute lymphocyte count remained below baseline with Thymoglobulin throughout the study (P<0.007), but with Atgam, significant lymphocyte reductions occurred only at day 7. The incidence of cytomegalovirus disease was less with Thymoglobulin than Atgam at 6 months (10% vs. 33%; P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Brief (7-day) induction with Thymoglobulin resulted in less frequent and less severe rejection, a better event-free survival, less cytomegalovirus disease, fewer serious adverse events, but more frequent early leukopenia than induction with Atgam. These results may in fact be explained by a more profound and durable beneficial lymphopenia.
Authors: Peter A McSweeney; Richard A Nash; Keith M Sullivan; Jan Storek; Leslie J Crofford; Roger Dansey; Maureen D Mayes; Kevin T McDonagh; J Lee Nelson; Theodore A Gooley; Leona A Holmberg; C S Chen; Mark H Wener; Katherine Ryan; Julie Sunderhaus; Ken Russell; John Rambharose; Rainer Storb; Daniel E Furst Journal: Blood Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Phillip Scheinberg; Olga Nunez; Barbara Weinstein; Priscila Scheinberg; Colin O Wu; Neal S Young Journal: Blood Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Xingmin Feng; Sachiko Kajigaya; Elena E Solomou; Keyvan Keyvanfar; Xiuli Xu; Nalini Raghavachari; Peter J Munson; Thomas M Herndon; Jichun Chen; Neal S Young Journal: Blood Date: 2008-02-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: C Meyer; J Walker; J Dewane; F Engelmann; W Laub; S Pillai; Charles R Thomas; I Messaoudi Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Charles D Varnell; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Cassie L Kirby; Lisa J Martin; Barry L Warshaw; Hiren P Patel; Deepa H Chand; Gina-Marie Barletta; Scott K Van Why; Rene G VanDeVoorde; Donald J Weaver; Amy Wilson; Priya S Verghese; Alexander A Vinks; Larry A Greenbaum; Jens Goebel; David K Hooper Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2017-09-04
Authors: Karen L Hardinger; Sunny Rhee; Paula Buchanan; Matt Koch; Brent Miller; Decha Enkvetchakul; Rebecca Schuessler; Mark A Schnitzler; Daniel C Brennan Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 4.939