| Literature DB >> 20981278 |
Stavros A Kavouras1, Demosthenes B Panagiotakos, Christos Pitsavos, Christina Chrysohoou, Giannis Arnaoutis, Yannis Skoumas, Christodoulos Stefanadis.
Abstract
We studied the association of physical activity and adherence to the Mediterranean diet, in total antioxidant capacity (TAC). A random sample of 1514 men and 1528 women was selected from Attica region. Physical activity was assessed with a translated version of the validated "International Physical Activity Questionnaire" (iPAQ), and dietary intake through a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was assessed by the MedDietScore that incorporated the inherent characteristics of this diet. TAC was positively correlated with the degree of physical activity (P < .05). TAC was also positively correlated with MedDietScore (r = 0.24, P < .001). Stratified analysis by diet status revealed that the most beneficial results were observed to highly active people as compared to inactive, who also followed the Mediterranean diet (288 ± 70 μmol/L, 230 ± 50 μmol/L, resp.), after adjusting for various confounders. Increased physical activity and greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet were associated with increased total antioxidant capacity.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20981278 PMCID: PMC2963115 DOI: 10.4061/2011/248626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res Pract ISSN: 2090-0597 Impact factor: 1.866
Lifestyle, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of the participants, according to Mediterranean diet score.
| Men ( | Women ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile of diet score | |||||||
| 1st (0–20) | 2nd (21–35) | 3rd (36–55) | 1st (0–20) | 2nd (21–35) | 3rd (36–55) | ||
| Age (years) | 44 ± 11 | 42 ± 8 | 48 ± 7** | 43 ± 7 | 45 ± 7* | 47 ± 6** | .01 |
| Years of education | 11 ± 4 | 13 ± 4 | 14 ± 5 | 9 ± 4 | 10 ± 4 | 13 ± 3 | .001 |
| Current smoking (%) | 49 | 46 | 44 | 40 | 39 | 38 | .21 |
| Physical activity status | .001 | ||||||
| 63 | 26** | 11** | 70 | 22** | 8** | ||
| 64 | 26** | 10** | 71 | 21** | 8** | ||
| 59 | 25** | 16** | 65 | 25** | 10** | ||
| METs min/week | 965 ± 1512 | 976 ± 1495 | 1429 ± 2023** | 728 ± 1262 | 688 ± 1027* | 901 ± 1281** | .03 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 27 ± 5 | 26 ± 4 | 25 ± 5* | 26 ± 3 | 24 ± 4* | 24 ± 3* | .04 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 129 ± 17 | 125 ± 18* | 125 ± 17* | 129 ± 18 | 120 ± 18** | 120 ± 19** | .003 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 83 ± 11 | 81 ± 14 | 80 ± 11 | 80 ± 11 | 75 ± 12 | 75 ± 10 | .25 |
| Hypertension (%) | 51 | 27** | 20** | 50 | 36** | 10** | .001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 197 ± 43 | 194 ± 41 | 194 ± 43 | 196 ± 40 | 190 ± 42 | 188 ± 47 | .14 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 134 ± 43 | 124 ± 38 | 124 ± 42 | 126 ± 39 | 120 ± 37 | 120 ± 41 | .07 |
| Hypercholesterolemia (%) | 45 | 39 | 36 | 51 | 47 | 25 | .08 |
| TAC ( | 225 ± 33 | 242 ± 31** | 251 ± 32** | 231 ± 26 | 239 ± 29* | 255 ± 44** | .002 |
TAC: total antioxidant capacity; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; LDL: low density lipoprotein.
Data are presented as mean ± SD and percentages.
No significant interactions were observed between tertile of diet score and sex.
⊥ Probability values are derived from ANOVA and evaluate the association between tertiles of diet score and the investigated variables, after adjusting for sex.
*P-value < .05; **P-value < .01 for the comparisons between 2nd, 3rd tertile versus 1st tertile of diet group.
Figure 1TAC levels and physical activity status (inactive, min-active, and HEPA active) by MedDietScore that assessed adherence to the Mediterranean diet (away, close, and very close).
Results from multiple linear regression analysis that evaluated the association of physical activity status (independent) on TAC levels (dependent), by dietary habits.
| Mediterranean diet status | Physical activity status | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Away | 13.47 ± 5.7 | .21 | |
| 3.34 ± 2.6 | .48 | ||
| Age (years) | −0.14 ± 0.2 | .58 | |
| Males versus females | −4.36 ± 6.7 | .52 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.32 ± 0.64 | .62 | |
| Close | 15.7 ± 9.4 | .05 | |
| 2.82 ± 4.3 | .09 | ||
| Age (years) | −0.76 ± 0.3 | .03 | |
| Males versus Females | −4.85 ± 8.2 | .56 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −1.79 ± 1.33 | .18 | |
| Very close | 19.7 ± 7.4 | .03 | |
| 2.4 ± 9.6 | .06 | ||
| Age (years) | −0.16 ± 0.3 | .65 | |
| Males versus females | −21.8 ± 10.7 | .04 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.35 ± 1.30 | .78 | |