BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is the most frequent malignancy in men and the second leading cause of death in the male population worldwide. The screening for prostate cancer allows early diagnosis of prostate malignancy before the individual presents with symptoms. The early stage of the disease is easier to manage by different therapeutic modalities. AIM: The aim of this review is to evaluate the reasons and facts for enthusiasm and positive approach towards the clinical decision about whether to screen or not male patients for early detection of prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed a computerized MEDLINE search followed by a manual bibliographic review of cross-references. These reports were analyzed and the important findings were summarized. We analyzed the methods and schedule of screening, as well as advantages and disadvantages of the prostate cancer screening. RESULTS: There were more than a hundred studies on prostate cancer screening performed but only a few are eligible for a decisive conclusion concerning the prostate cancer screening issue. We reviewed the screening methods, the schedule of screening, the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening. CONCLUSION: The role for prostate cancer screening is not established yet. Definite proof of screening should be assumed as a decrease in the death rate of that cancer due to screening activity.
BACKGROUND:Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is the most frequent malignancy in men and the second leading cause of death in the male population worldwide. The screening for prostate cancer allows early diagnosis of prostate malignancy before the individual presents with symptoms. The early stage of the disease is easier to manage by different therapeutic modalities. AIM: The aim of this review is to evaluate the reasons and facts for enthusiasm and positive approach towards the clinical decision about whether to screen or not male patients for early detection of prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed a computerized MEDLINE search followed by a manual bibliographic review of cross-references. These reports were analyzed and the important findings were summarized. We analyzed the methods and schedule of screening, as well as advantages and disadvantages of the prostate cancer screening. RESULTS: There were more than a hundred studies on prostate cancer screening performed but only a few are eligible for a decisive conclusion concerning the prostate cancer screening issue. We reviewed the screening methods, the schedule of screening, the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening. CONCLUSION: The role for prostate cancer screening is not established yet. Definite proof of screening should be assumed as a decrease in the death rate of that cancer due to screening activity.
Authors: Renske Postma; Fritz H Schröder; Geert J L H van Leenders; Robert F Hoedemaeker; Andre N Vis; Monique J Roobol; Theodorus H van der Kwast Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-01-16 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Renske Postma; Arno G J L H van Leenders; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Theodorus H van der Kwast Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2005-12-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Mohamed H Radwan; Yan Yan; Jason R Luly; Robert S Figenshau; Steven B Brandes; Sam B Bhayani; Arnold D Bullock; Ye Liefu; Gerald L Andriole; Adam S Kibel Journal: Urology Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: S Saidi; V Georgiev; S Stavridis; D Petrovski; S Dohcev; L Lekovski; Z Popov; S Banev; G Spasovski Journal: Hippokratia Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 0.471
Authors: Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Ervis Sofroni; Naum Papanicolau; Omar Falou; Linda Sugar; Gerard Morton; Martin J Yaffe; Robert Nam; Alireza Sadeghian; Michael C Kolios; Hans T Chung; Gregory J Czarnota Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.243