Literature DB >> 16434136

Tumour features in the control and screening arm of a randomized trial of prostate cancer.

Renske Postma1, Arno G J L H van Leenders, Monique J Roobol, Fritz H Schröder, Theodorus H van der Kwast.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare tumour characteristics at the time of diagnosis of cancers detected in the screening and control arm at the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Rotterdam section of the ERSPC. Men were randomized to the screening arm (n=21,210) or the control arm (n=21,166). Men randomized to screening were offered PSA testing every 4 years. Through linkage with the cancer registry, men randomized to the control arm were detected. The biopsy Gleason score was determined in 1,591 and 373 patients in the screening and control arm, respectively. TURP, radical prostatectomy (RP) and cystoprostatectomy were evaluated for Gleason score, pathological (p)T stage and tumour volume.
RESULTS: More prostate cancers were detected in the screening arm (15.9 vs. 4.2 per 1000 man years, p<0.0001). Clinical stage distribution as well as biopsy and RP Gleason score distribution were significantly less favourable in the control arm. The incidence in man years of advanced disease (i.e. T4/N1/M1) was higher in the screening arm (6.0 per 100,000) as compared to the control arm (4.6 per 100,000). The 5-year PSA progression free survival after RP was 68% in the control arm and 89% in the screening arm (p<0.0001). The proportion of Incidental prostate cancers was 9.3% of all cancers detected in the control arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of men with advanced prostate cancer is slightly higher in the screening arm, the proportion of prostate cancers with favourable features is increased in the screening arm as compared to that in the control arm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16434136     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  6 in total

1.  Stage shift in PSA-detected prostate cancers - effect modification by Gleason score.

Authors:  Nora Pashayan; Paul Pharoah; David E Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Jenny Donovan; Richard M Martin; David Greenberg; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Screening for prostate cancer: a controversy or fact.

Authors:  S Stavridis; S Saidi; Lj Lekovski; S Dohcev; G Spasovski
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 3.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Quality of life among symptomatic compared to PSA-detected prostate cancer survivors - results from a UK wide patient-reported outcomes study.

Authors:  David W Donnelly; Linda C Vis; Therese Kearney; Linda Sharp; Damien Bennett; Sarah Wilding; Amy Downing; Penny Wright; Eila Watson; Richard Wagland; William R Cross; Malcolm D Mason; Sabine Siesling; Jeannette G van Manen; Adam W Glaser; Anna Gavin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  N L Sharma; N C Shah; D E Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer.

Authors:  C H Bangma; S Roemeling; F H Schröder
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.