Literature DB >> 20980196

Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.

Géza Gergely Ambrus1, Andrea Antal, Walter Paulus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We have investigated the cutaneous perception differences for anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) between two electrode configurations: a standard, rectangle-shaped, and a circle-shaped, round geometry with the same surface area, and thus, same nominal current distribution. We have aimed to find whether a smaller perimeter length and the absence of corners in the case of the round configuration would lead to altered skin perception characteristics when compared to the rectangular geometry.
METHODS: Twelve subjects were tested for tDCS and tRNS skin perception characteristics in the intensity range of 200-2000 μA using round and rectangular electrode configurations.
RESULTS: We have not found any substantial differences between detection thresholds, detection rates, false positive rates or consistent alterations in the sites of perceived stimulation.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is no difference between the round and the rectangular electrode configurations regarding their blinding potentials. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this investigation indicate that the altering of the electrode geometry to a round configuration is unwarranted for better blinding purposes in future studies using tDCS and tRNS.
Copyright © 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20980196     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  13 in total

1.  Cutaneous perception during tDCS: role of electrode shape and sponge salinity.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Using transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to understand cognitive processing.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Josh D Cosman; Keisuke Fukuda; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Central nervous system physiology.

Authors:  John Rothwell; Andrea Antal; David Burke; Antony Carlsen; Dejan Georgiev; Marjan Jahanshahi; Dagmar Sternad; Josep Valls-Solé; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Jacek P Dmochowski; Abhishek Datta; Yu Huang; Jessica D Richardson; Marom Bikson; Julius Fridriksson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Enhanced locomotor adaptation aftereffect in the "broken escalator" phenomenon using anodal tDCS.

Authors:  D Kaski; S Quadir; M Patel; N Yousif; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Impairment of Long-Term Plasticity of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells Eliminates the Effect of Anodal Direct Current Stimulation on Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Habituation.

Authors:  Suman Das; Marcella Spoor; Tafadzwa M Sibindi; Peter Holland; Martijn Schonewille; Chris I De Zeeuw; Maarten A Frens; Opher Donchin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Seeing the World as it is: Mimicking Veridical Motion Perception in Schizophrenia Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Gorana Pobric; Johan Hulleman; Michal Lavidor; Gail Silipo; Stephanie Rohrig; Elisa Dias; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Multitasking Throughput Capacity.

Authors:  Justin Nelson; Richard A McKinley; Chandler Phillips; Lindsey McIntire; Chuck Goodyear; Aerial Kreiner; Lanie Monforton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Transspinal Direct Current Stimulation Produces Persistent Plasticity in Human Motor Pathways.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Behdad Tahayori; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.