Géza Gergely Ambrus1, Andrea Antal, Walter Paulus. 1. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany. g.ambrus@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We have investigated the cutaneous perception differences for anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) between two electrode configurations: a standard, rectangle-shaped, and a circle-shaped, round geometry with the same surface area, and thus, same nominal current distribution. We have aimed to find whether a smaller perimeter length and the absence of corners in the case of the round configuration would lead to altered skin perception characteristics when compared to the rectangular geometry. METHODS: Twelve subjects were tested for tDCS and tRNS skin perception characteristics in the intensity range of 200-2000 μA using round and rectangular electrode configurations. RESULTS: We have not found any substantial differences between detection thresholds, detection rates, false positive rates or consistent alterations in the sites of perceived stimulation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is no difference between the round and the rectangular electrode configurations regarding their blinding potentials. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this investigation indicate that the altering of the electrode geometry to a round configuration is unwarranted for better blinding purposes in future studies using tDCS and tRNS.
OBJECTIVE: We have investigated the cutaneous perception differences for anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) between two electrode configurations: a standard, rectangle-shaped, and a circle-shaped, round geometry with the same surface area, and thus, same nominal current distribution. We have aimed to find whether a smaller perimeter length and the absence of corners in the case of the round configuration would lead to altered skin perception characteristics when compared to the rectangular geometry. METHODS: Twelve subjects were tested for tDCS and tRNS skin perception characteristics in the intensity range of 200-2000 μA using round and rectangular electrode configurations. RESULTS: We have not found any substantial differences between detection thresholds, detection rates, false positive rates or consistent alterations in the sites of perceived stimulation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is no difference between the round and the rectangular electrode configurations regarding their blinding potentials. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this investigation indicate that the altering of the electrode geometry to a round configuration is unwarranted for better blinding purposes in future studies using tDCS and tRNS.
Authors: Jacek P Dmochowski; Abhishek Datta; Yu Huang; Jessica D Richardson; Marom Bikson; Julius Fridriksson; Lucas C Parra Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Suman Das; Marcella Spoor; Tafadzwa M Sibindi; Peter Holland; Martijn Schonewille; Chris I De Zeeuw; Maarten A Frens; Opher Donchin Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 4.677