Literature DB >> 20980036

Factors affecting porcine sperm mediated gene transfer.

Francisco Alberto García-Vázquez1, Salvador Ruiz, Luis Alberto Grullón, Aitor de Ondiz, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán, Joaquín Gadea.   

Abstract

"Sperm mediated gene transfer" (SMGT) is based on the ability of sperm cells to bind exogenous DNA. The main objective of this study was to improve the production of transgenic pigs by SMGT. Taking into account that there is a lack of repeatability in studies of SMGT and that the mechanism of binding and internalization of exogenous DNA is a question that has not been solved, different factors involved in the production of transgenic animals by SMGT method were evaluated. Here we set out to: (1) evaluate the sperm capacity to bind exogenous DNA after DMSO treatment; (2) determine the location of the transgene-spermatozoa interaction; and (3) evaluate the efficiency of production of transgenic piglets by deep intrauterine artificial insemination (AI) with sperm incubated with DNA. The percentage of DNA binding was higher than 30% after 2h of co-culture, but it was not affected by sperm treatment with DMSO (0.3% or 3%). The integrity of the sperm plasma membrane plays a critical role in DNA interaction, and altered plasma membranes facilitate interactions with exogenous DNA. DNA bound mainly to spermatozoa with reduced viability. DNA molecules were found to be mainly associated to the post-acrosomal region (61.9%). After deep intrauterine AI a total of 29 piglets were obtained, but none of them integrated the transgene. In conclusion, although it has been confirmed that DNA can associate with boar spermatozoa, the efficiency of producing transgenic pigs by AI was not confirmed by the present experiments, mainly due to a reduced DNA binding to functional spermatozoa. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20980036     DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  5 in total

1.  Hyperactive self-inactivating piggyBac for transposase-enhanced pronuclear microinjection transgenesis.

Authors:  Joel Marh; Zoia Stoytcheva; Johann Urschitz; Atsushi Sugawara; Hideaki Yamashiro; Jesse B Owens; Ilko Stoytchev; Pawel Pelczar; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; Stefan Moisyadi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Generation of transgenic pigs by cytoplasmic injection of piggyBac transposase-based pmGENIE-3 plasmids.

Authors:  Zicong Li; Fang Zeng; Fanming Meng; Zhiqian Xu; Xianwei Zhang; Xiaoling Huang; Fei Tang; Wenchao Gao; Junsong Shi; Xiaoyan He; Dewu Liu; Chong Wang; Johann Urschitz; Stefan Moisyadi; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Pig transgenesis by piggyBac transposition in combination with somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Zhenfang Wu; Zhiqian Xu; Xian Zou; Fang Zeng; Junsong Shi; Dewu Liu; Johann Urschitz; Stefan Moisyadi; Zicong Li
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Historical DNA Manipulation Overview.

Authors:  Lluis Montoliu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Intratesticular injection followed by electroporation allows gene transfer in caprine spermatogenic cells.

Authors:  R Kumar Pramod; Abhijit Mitra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.