BACKGROUND:Barbershop-based hypertension (HTN) outreach programs for black men are becoming increasingly common, but whether they are an effective approach for improving HTN control remains uncertain. METHODS: To evaluate whether a continuous high blood pressure (BP) monitoring and referral program conducted by barbers motivates male patrons with elevated BP to pursue physician follow-up, leading to improved HTN control, a cluster randomized trial (BARBER-1) of HTN control was conducted among black male patrons of 17 black-owned barbershops in Dallas County, Texas (March 2006-December 2008). Participants underwent 10-week baseline BP screening, and then study sites were randomized to a comparison group that received standard BP pamphlets (8 shops, 77 hypertensive patrons per shop) or an intervention group in which barbers continually offered BP checks with haircuts and promoted physician follow-up with sex-specific peer-based health messaging (9 shops, 75 hypertensive patrons per shop). After 10 months, follow-up data were obtained. The primary outcome measure was change in HTN control rate for each barbershop. RESULTS: The HTN control rate increased more in intervention barbershops than in comparison barbershops (absolute group difference, 8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.8%-16.9%]) (P = .04); the intervention effect persisted after adjustment for covariates (P = .03). A marginal intervention effect was found for systolic BP change (absolute group difference, -2.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -5.3 to 0.3 mm Hg]) (P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of BP screening on HTN control among black male barbershop patrons was improved when barbers were enabled to become health educators, monitor BP, and promote physician follow-up. Further research is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00325533.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Barbershop-based hypertension (HTN) outreach programs for black men are becoming increasingly common, but whether they are an effective approach for improving HTN control remains uncertain. METHODS: To evaluate whether a continuous high blood pressure (BP) monitoring and referral program conducted by barbers motivates male patrons with elevated BP to pursue physician follow-up, leading to improved HTN control, a cluster randomized trial (BARBER-1) of HTN control was conducted among black male patrons of 17 black-owned barbershops in Dallas County, Texas (March 2006-December 2008). Participants underwent 10-week baseline BP screening, and then study sites were randomized to a comparison group that received standard BP pamphlets (8 shops, 77 hypertensive patrons per shop) or an intervention group in which barbers continually offered BP checks with haircuts and promoted physician follow-up with sex-specific peer-based health messaging (9 shops, 75 hypertensive patrons per shop). After 10 months, follow-up data were obtained. The primary outcome measure was change in HTN control rate for each barbershop. RESULTS: The HTN control rate increased more in intervention barbershops than in comparison barbershops (absolute group difference, 8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.8%-16.9%]) (P = .04); the intervention effect persisted after adjustment for covariates (P = .03). A marginal intervention effect was found for systolic BP change (absolute group difference, -2.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -5.3 to 0.3 mm Hg]) (P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of BP screening on HTN control among black male barbershop patrons was improved when barbers were enabled to become health educators, monitor BP, and promote physician follow-up. Further research is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00325533.
Authors: G Parati; G S Stergiou; R Asmar; G Bilo; P de Leeuw; Y Imai; K Kario; E Lurbe; A Manolis; T Mengden; E O'Brien; T Ohkubo; P Padfield; P Palatini; T G Pickering; J Redon; M Revera; L M Ruilope; A Shennan; J A Staessen; A Tisler; B Waeber; A Zanchetti; G Mancia Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: J Nell Brownstein; Farah M Chowdhury; Susan L Norris; Tanya Horsley; Leonard Jack; Xuanping Zhang; Dawn Satterfield Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Glenn M Chertow; Pamela G Coxson; Andrew Moran; James M Lightwood; Mark J Pletcher; Lee Goldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronald G Victor; Joseph E Ravenell; Anne Freeman; Deepa G Bhat; Joy S Storm; Moiz Shafiq; Patricia Knowles; Peter J Hannan; Robert Haley; David Leonard Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Ronald G Victor; David Leonard; Paul Hess; Deepa G Bhat; Jennifer Jones; Patrice A C Vaeth; Joseph Ravenell; Anne Freeman; Ruth P Wilson; Robert W Haley Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-06-23
Authors: Trina E Chang; Charlotte D Brill; Lara Traeger; C Andres Bedoya; Aya Inamori; Patrick N Hagan; Katherine Flaherty; Katherine Hails; Albert Yeung; Nhi-Ha Trinh Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2015-12
Authors: John L Oliffe; Emma Rossnagel; Mary T Kelly; Joan L Bottorff; Cherisse Seaton; Francine Darroch Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Niharika Dixit; Gregory B Crawford; Manon Lemonde; Cynthia N Rittenberg; Paz Fernández-Ortega Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Helen Cole; Hayley S Thompson; Marilyn White; Ruth Browne; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Scott Braithwaite; Kevin Fiscella; Carla Boutin-Foster; Joseph Ravenell Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 9.308