Literature DB >> 22843435

Associations of multiple metals with kidney outcomes in lead workers.

Rebecca Shelley1, Nam-Soo Kim, Patrick Parsons, Byung-Kook Lee, Bernard Jaar, Jeffrey Fadrowski, Jacqueline Agnew, Genevieve M Matanoski, Brian S Schwartz, Amy Steuerwald, Andrew Todd, David Simon, Virginia M Weaver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Environmental exposure to multiple metals is common. A number of metals cause nephrotoxicity with acute and/or chronic exposure. However, few epidemiologic studies have examined the impact of metal coexposure on kidney function. Therefore, the authors evaluated associations of antimony and thallium with kidney outcomes and assessed the impact of cadmium exposure on those associations in lead workers.
METHODS: Multiple linear regression was used to examine associations between ln-urine thallium, antimony and cadmium levels with serum creatinine- and cystatin-C-based glomerular filtration measures and ln-urine N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG).
RESULTS: In 684 participants, median urine thallium and antimony were 0.39 and 0.36 μg/g creatinine, respectively. After adjustment for lead dose, urine creatinine and kidney risk factors, higher ln-urine thallium was associated with higher serum creatinine- and cystatin-C-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate; associations remained significant after adjustment for antimony and cadmium (regression coefficient for serum creatinine-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate =5.2 ml/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI =2.4 to 8.0). Antimony associations with kidney outcomes were attenuated by thallium and cadmium adjustment; thallium and antimony associations with NAG were attenuated by cadmium.
CONCLUSIONS: Urine thallium levels were significantly associated with both serum creatinine- and cystatin-C-based glomerular filtration measures in a direction opposite that expected with nephrotoxicity. Given similarities to associations recently observed with cadmium, these results suggest that interpretation of urine metal values, at exposure levels currently present in the environment, may be more complex than previously appreciated. These results also support multiple metal analysis approaches to decrease the potential for inaccurate risk conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843435      PMCID: PMC3542392          DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2012-100765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  37 in total

Review 1.  Multi-hit nature of chronic renal disease.

Authors:  V D Nenov; M W Taal; O V Sakharova; B M Brenner
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Thallium concentration in lake trout from Lake Michigan.

Authors:  T S Lin; J Nriagu; X Q Wang
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Biomarkers of metal toxicity in population studies: research potential and interpretation issues.

Authors:  Alfred Bernard
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2008

4.  Thallium poisoning in dogs.

Authors:  B C Zook; C E Gilmore
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1967-07-15       Impact factor: 1.936

5.  Experimental model of lead nephropathy. I. Continuous high-dose lead administration.

Authors:  F Khalil-Manesh; H C Gonick; A H Cohen; R Alinovi; E Bergamaschi; A Mutti; V J Rosen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Subacute toxicity of pentavalent antimony compounds in rats.

Authors:  A alKhawajah; E B Larbi; S Jain; Y al-Gindan; A Abahussain
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Acute thallium poisoning: toxicological and morphological studies of the nervous system.

Authors:  L E Davis; J C Standefer; M Kornfeld; D M Abercrombie; C Butler
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Associations of lead biomarkers with renal function in Korean lead workers.

Authors:  V M Weaver; B-K Lee; K-D Ahn; G-S Lee; A C Todd; W F Stewart; J Wen; D J Simon; P J Parsons; B S Schwartz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements.

Authors:  Dana B Barr; Lynn C Wilder; Samuel P Caudill; Amanda J Gonzalez; Lance L Needham; James L Pirkle
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  16 in total

1.  Associations of multiple metals with kidney outcomes in lead workers: author response.

Authors:  Rebecca Shelley; Nam-Soo Kim; Patrick J Parsons; Byung-Kook Lee; Bernard G Jaar; Jeffrey Fadrowski; Jacqueline Agnew; Genevieve Matanoski; Brian S Schwartz; Amy J Steuerwald; Andrew C Todd; David Simon; Virginia M Weaver
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Association of arsenic with kidney function in adolescents and young adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2012.

Authors:  Darcy Weidemann; Chin-Chi Kuo; Ana Navas-Acien; Alison G Abraham; Virginia Weaver; Jeffrey Fadrowski
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  The influence of Omega3 fatty acids supplementation against aluminum-induced toxicity in male albino rats.

Authors:  Samah S Oda
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  N-Acetyl-β-D-Glucosaminidase Does Not Enhance Prediction of Cardiovascular or All-Cause Mortality by Albuminuria in a Low-Risk Population.

Authors:  Marit D Solbu; Ingrid Toft; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Bjørn O Eriksen; Toralf Melsom; Inger Njølstad; Tom Wilsgaard; Trond G Jenssen
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Effects of environmental levels of cadmium, lead and mercury on human renal function evaluated by structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Jerome P Trzeciakowski; Lesley Gardiner; Alan R Parrish
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 6.  Challenges for environmental epidemiology research: are biomarker concentrations altered by kidney function or urine concentration adjustment?

Authors:  Virginia M Weaver; Dennis J Kotchmar; Jeffrey J Fadrowski; Ellen K Silbergeld
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Environment-Wide Association Study of CKD.

Authors:  Jeonghwan Lee; Sohee Oh; Habyeong Kang; Sunmi Kim; Gowoon Lee; Lilin Li; Clara Tammy Kim; Jung Nam An; Yun Kyu Oh; Chun Soo Lim; Dong Ki Kim; Yon Su Kim; Kyungho Choi; Jung Pyo Lee
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Impact of urine concentration adjustment method on associations between urine metals and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) in adolescents.

Authors:  Virginia M Weaver; Gonzalo García Vargas; Ellen K Silbergeld; Stephen J Rothenberg; Jeffrey J Fadrowski; Marisela Rubio-Andrade; Patrick J Parsons; Amy J Steuerwald; Ana Navas-Acien; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Uranium associations with kidney outcomes vary by urine concentration adjustment method.

Authors:  Rebecca Shelley; Nam-Soo Kim; Patrick J Parsons; Byung-Kook Lee; Jacqueline Agnew; Bernard G Jaar; Amy J Steuerwald; Genevieve Matanoski; Jeffrey Fadrowski; Brian S Schwartz; Andrew C Todd; David Simon; Virginia M Weaver
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 10.  Toxic environmental exposures and kidney health in children.

Authors:  Darcy K Weidemann; Virginia M Weaver; Jeffrey J Fadrowski
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.