Literature DB >> 20973599

Contextual interference effects in sequence learning for young and older adults.

Chien-Ho Janice Lin1, Allan D Wu, Parima Udompholkul, Barbara J Knowlton.   

Abstract

Practice of different tasks in a random order induces better retention than practicing them in a blocked order, a phenomenon known as the contextual interference (CI) effect. Our purpose was to investigate whether the CI effect exists in sequence learning, such that practicing different sequences in a random order will result in better learning of sequences than practicing them in blocks, and whether this effect is affected by aging. Subjects practiced a serial reaction time task where a set of three 4-element sequences were arranged in blocks or in a random order on 2 successive days. Subjects were divided into 4 groups based on a 2-GROUP (young or old) by 2-ORDER (random or blocked practice) between-subject design. Three days after practice (Day 5), subjects were tested with practiced and novel sequences to evaluate sequence-specific learning. The results replicate the CI effect in sequence learning in both young and older adults. Older adults retained sequences better when trained in a random condition than in a blocked condition, although the random condition incurs greater task switching costs in older adults during practice. Our study underscores the distinction between age-related effects on learning vs. performance, and offers practical implications for enhancing skill learning in older adults. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20973599     DOI: 10.1037/a0020196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  8 in total

1.  Mechanisms of the contextual interference effect in individuals poststroke.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Jeong-Yoon Lee; Hui-Ting Goh; Youggeun Choi; Sung Shin Kim; Jill Campbell Stewart; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  When less is more: costs and benefits of varied vs. fixed content and structure in short-term task switching training.

Authors:  Katrina Sabah; Thomas Dolk; Nachshon Meiran; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-05

4.  Application of anodal tDCS at primary motor cortex immediately after practice of a motor sequence does not improve offline gain.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Austin McCulloch; Hakjoo Kim; Taewon Kim; Joohyun Rhee; Willem B Verwey; John J Buchanan; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Investigation of Feedback Schedules on Speech Motor Learning in Older Adults.

Authors:  Phil Weir-Mayta; Kristie A Spencer; Steven M Bierer; Ayoub Daliri; Peter Ondish; Ashley France; Erika Hutchison; Caitlin Sears
Journal:  Int J Aging Res       Date:  2019

Review 6.  Applying principles of motor learning and control to upper extremity rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lisa M Muratori; Eric M Lamberg; Lori Quinn; Susan V Duff
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

7.  Challenge to promote change: both young and older adults benefit from contextual interference.

Authors:  Lisa Pauwels; Kathleen Vancleef; Stephan P Swinnen; Iseult A M Beets
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Interleaved practice benefits implicit sequence learning and transfer.

Authors:  Julia M Schorn; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.