BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the use of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery in Switzerland. METHODS: Ninety-eight heads of surgical departments in Switzerland and 42 visceral surgeons in private practice were asked to answer an 18-item questionnaire in October 2008 about arguments in favor of or against MBP. The participants also indicated whether they use MBP and antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery, and if so, what agents were used. Of the participants, 117/140 (83%) responded. Additional data were collected pertaining to the respondents' experience and work situation. RESULTS: MBP was used significantly more often for rectal surgery than for left colonic resections (83% vs. 53%; p < 0.001) and more often for left than for right colonic resections (53% vs. 43%; p = 0.001), regardless of the open or laparoscopic approach. Younger surgeons and surgeons with a higher case load in colorectal surgery used MBP significantly less frequently in open right colonic resections. For MBP, cathartics were used in 90% of patients, and enemas were used in 10% of patients. Of the respondents, 37% considered MBP to be useful, even very useful. Based on the literature, because of introduction of fast-track protocols or for considerations of patient comfort, 86% of the respondents had changed the bowel preparation regime during the last 10 years in terms of a reduction of the quantity of cathartics or restricted the indications for MBP. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was used by 100% of the respondents, 88% used a single prophylactic dose only, while 70% administered the antibiotics 30-59 min before the incision. Most of the surgeons used second-generation cephalosporins in combination with metronidazole, and 24% changed the antibiotic agent or reduced the duration of administration of antibiotics during the last 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: MBP is often used in open and laparoscopic rectal surgery, but not in right colonic resections. Scientific evidence regarding MBP has yielded a rethinking about rigorous bowel preparation regimes. As of now, surgeons in Switzerland are not yet unanimously ready to abandon MBP in elective colorectal surgery. In Switzerland, surgeons are influenced by the benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the use of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery in Switzerland. METHODS: Ninety-eight heads of surgical departments in Switzerland and 42 visceral surgeons in private practice were asked to answer an 18-item questionnaire in October 2008 about arguments in favor of or against MBP. The participants also indicated whether they use MBP and antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery, and if so, what agents were used. Of the participants, 117/140 (83%) responded. Additional data were collected pertaining to the respondents' experience and work situation. RESULTS: MBP was used significantly more often for rectal surgery than for left colonic resections (83% vs. 53%; p < 0.001) and more often for left than for right colonic resections (53% vs. 43%; p = 0.001), regardless of the open or laparoscopic approach. Younger surgeons and surgeons with a higher case load in colorectal surgery used MBP significantly less frequently in open right colonic resections. For MBP, cathartics were used in 90% of patients, and enemas were used in 10% of patients. Of the respondents, 37% considered MBP to be useful, even very useful. Based on the literature, because of introduction of fast-track protocols or for considerations of patient comfort, 86% of the respondents had changed the bowel preparation regime during the last 10 years in terms of a reduction of the quantity of cathartics or restricted the indications for MBP. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was used by 100% of the respondents, 88% used a single prophylactic dose only, while 70% administered the antibiotics 30-59 min before the incision. Most of the surgeons used second-generation cephalosporins in combination with metronidazole, and 24% changed the antibiotic agent or reduced the duration of administration of antibiotics during the last 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: MBP is often used in open and laparoscopic rectal surgery, but not in right colonic resections. Scientific evidence regarding MBP has yielded a rethinking about rigorous bowel preparation regimes. As of now, surgeons in Switzerland are not yet unanimously ready to abandon MBP in elective colorectal surgery. In Switzerland, surgeons are influenced by the benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.
Authors: Walter P Weber; Walter R Marti; Marcel Zwahlen; Heidi Misteli; Rachel Rosenthal; Stefan Reck; Philipp Fueglistaler; Martin Bolli; Andrej Trampuz; Daniel Oertli; Andreas F Widmer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: P R Fa-Si-Oen; C Verwaest; J Buitenweg; H Putter; J-W de Waard; C J H van de Velde; R M H Roumen Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner; Luay Hajjar; Taeseok Park; Jonathan E Efron; Juan J Nogueras; Eric G Weiss Journal: Am Surg Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Carlos E Pineda; Andrew A Shelton; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; John M Morton; Mark L Welton Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-07-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: E P Dellinger; P A Gross; T L Barrett; P J Krause; W J Martone; J E McGowan; R L Sweet; R P Wenzel Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: J V Roig; A García-Fadrique; J García-Armengol; M Bruna; C Redondo; M J García-Coret; P Albors Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2008-04-28 Impact factor: 3.788