Literature DB >> 15484356

Physiologic effects of bowel preparation.

Kathrine Holte1, Kristine Grubbe Nielsen, Jan Lysgård Madsen, Henrik Kehlet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the universal use of bowel preparation before colonoscopy and colorectal surgery, the physiologic effects have not been described in a standardized setting. This study was designed to investigate the physiologic effects of bowel preparation.
METHODS: In a prospective study, 12 healthy volunteers (median age, 63 years) underwent bowel preparation with bisacodyl and sodium phosphate. Fluid and food intake were standardized according to weight, providing adequate calorie and oral fluid intake. Before and after bowel preparation, weight, exercise capacity, orthostatic tolerance, plasma and extracellular volume, balance function, and biochemical parameters were measured.
RESULTS: Bowel preparation led to a significant decrease in exercise capacity (median, 9 percent) and weight (median, 1.2 kg). Plasma osmolality was significantly increased from 287 to 290 mmol kg(-1), as well as increased phosphate and urea concentrations, whereas calcium and potassium concentrations decreased significantly after bowel preparation. No differences in plasma or extracellular volumes were seen. Orthostatic tolerance and balance function did not change after bowel preparation.
CONCLUSIONS: Bowel preparation has significant adverse physiologic effects, which may be attributed to dehydration. The majority of these findings is small and may not be of clinical relevance in otherwise healthy patients undergoing bowel preparation and following recommendations for oral fluid intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15484356     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0592-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  49 in total

1.  A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Rawlinson; P Kang; J Evans; A Khanna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Perioperative fluid management.

Authors:  Zubin M Bamboat; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

Review 3.  Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety--a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Naoki Chiba; Robert Enns; Margaret Marcon; Susan Natsheh; Co Pham; Dan Sadowski; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Mechanical bowel preparation and antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery in Switzerland--a survey.

Authors:  Adrian Businger; Gabriela Grunder; Marc-Olivier Guenin; Christoph Ackermann; Ralph Peterli; Markus von Flüe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Sham feed or sham? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of gum chewing on gut function after elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Craig N Parnaby; Alisdair J MacDonald; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  The relationship of perioperative fluid administration to outcomes in colorectal and pancreatic surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Oliver S Eng; Laleh G Melstrom; Darren R Carpizo
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 9.  Enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Julian Smith; Raj S Pruthi; John McGrath
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Usefulness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol as compared with conventional perioperative care in gastric surgery.

Authors:  Takanobu Yamada; Tsutomu Hayashi; Haruhiko Cho; Takaki Yoshikawa; Hideki Taniguchi; Ryoji Fukushima; Akira Tsuburaya
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.