BACKGROUND: The internet is an important source of healthcare information. To date, assessment of its use as a source of oncologic information has been restricted to retrospective surveys. METHODS: The cancer-related searches of approximately 361,916,185 people in the United States and the United Kingdom were examined. Data were collected from two separate 100-day periods in 2008 and 2010. RESULTS: In 2008, there were 97,531 searches. The majority of searches related to basic cancer information (18,700, 19%), followed by treatment (8404, 9%) and diagnosis (6460, 7%). This compares with 179,025 searches in 2010 representing an increase of 183%. In 2008 breast cancer accounted for 21,102 (21%) individual searches, increasing to 85,825 searches in 2010. In 2010 a total of 0.2% (321) of searches focused on litigation, with those searching for breast cancer information most likely to research this topic (P=0.000). CONCLUSION: Use of the internet as a source of oncological information is increasing rapidly. These searches represent the most sensitive information relating to cancer, including prognosis and litigation. It is imperative now that efforts are made to ensure the reliability and comprehensiveness of this information.
BACKGROUND: The internet is an important source of healthcare information. To date, assessment of its use as a source of oncologic information has been restricted to retrospective surveys. METHODS: The cancer-related searches of approximately 361,916,185 people in the United States and the United Kingdom were examined. Data were collected from two separate 100-day periods in 2008 and 2010. RESULTS: In 2008, there were 97,531 searches. The majority of searches related to basic cancer information (18,700, 19%), followed by treatment (8404, 9%) and diagnosis (6460, 7%). This compares with 179,025 searches in 2010 representing an increase of 183%. In 2008 breast cancer accounted for 21,102 (21%) individual searches, increasing to 85,825 searches in 2010. In 2010 a total of 0.2% (321) of searches focused on litigation, with those searching for breast cancer information most likely to research this topic (P=0.000). CONCLUSION: Use of the internet as a source of oncological information is increasing rapidly. These searches represent the most sensitive information relating to cancer, including prognosis and litigation. It is imperative now that efforts are made to ensure the reliability and comprehensiveness of this information.
Authors: Elisabeth Nilsson-Ihrfelt; Marie-Louise Fjällskog; Carl Blomqvist; Johan Ahlgren; Per Edlund; Jörgen Hansen; Lena Malmberg; Kenneth Villman; Gerhard Andersson Journal: Breast Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: James M Metz; Pamela Devine; Albert DeNittis; Heather Jones; Margaret Hampshire; Joel Goldwein; Richard Whittington Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joshua Fogel; Steven M Albert; Freya Schnabel; Beth Ann Ditkoff; Alfred I Neugut Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2002 Apr-Nov Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: C O'Brien; J Kelly; E A Lehane; V Livingstone; B Cotter; A Butt; L Kelly; M A Corrigan Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Julie K Silver; Vishwa S Raj; Jack B Fu; Eric M Wisotzky; Sean Robinson Smith; Sasha E Knowlton; Alexander J Silver Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: David S Y Chan; Anita Willicombe; Thomas D Reid; Ceri Beaton; David Arnold; James Ward; I Llion Davies; Wyn G Lewis Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Melanie de Looper; Julia C M van Weert; Barbara C Schouten; Sifra Bolle; Eric H J Belgers; Eric H Eddes; Ellen M A Smets Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 5.428