Literature DB >> 20972636

Atypical ductal hyperplasia in directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications: considerations for surgical excision.

Christopher V Nguyen1, Constance T Albarracin, Gary J Whitman, Adriana Lopez, Nour Sneige.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to analyze clinicopathologic features of patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed on directional vacuum-assisted biopsy (DVAB) targeting microcalcifications to identify factors predicting the presence of carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical, mammographic, and histologic features of 140 patients with DVAB-diagnosed ADH who underwent either segmental excision (86.4%) or mammographic follow-up (≥2 years; 13.6%). Cases with mass lesions or ipsilateral cancer were excluded.
RESULTS: In 16 cases, carcinoma was found on excision. All cases without excision showed no new abnormalities on mammographic follow-up. Only the amount of calcifications removed (≤95%) significantly correlated with the rate of upgrade of ADH to carcinoma (P = .037). Significant histologic predictors of upgrade to carcinoma included number of terminal duct-lobular units (TDLU; >2) involved (P = .0306), presence of significant cytologic atypia suspicious for intermediate or high-grade carcinoma (P < .0001), and necrosis (P = .0006). Among ADH cases without significant atypia and/or necrosis, the extent of ADH (≤2 vs. >2 TDLU involved) was not a significant predictor of carcinoma (P = 1.0000).
CONCLUSIONS: ADH associated with calcifications in the absence of a mass lesion can be categorized into different risk groups using a multidisciplinary approach with correlation of histologic and mammographic findings. ADH lesions with significant cytologic atypia and/or necrosis are most likely to be associated with carcinoma and should be excised. ADH without these features, regardless of extent of involvement, and with >95% removal of the targeted calcifications, is associated with a minimal risk (<3%) of carcinoma and may undergo mammographic follow-up only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972636     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1127-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  22 in total

1.  AGO Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Update 2011.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssen; Anton Scharl; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Outcome analysis of 9-gauge MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle breast biopsies.

Authors:  Gaiane M Rauch; Basak E Dogan; Taletha B Smith; Ping Liu; Wei T Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Upgrade of high-risk breast lesions detected on mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Tehillah S Menes; Robert Rosenberg; Steven Balch; Shabnam Jaffer; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Management of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core biopsies and experiences from prospective high-risk breast lesion conferences at an academic institution.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Li; Zhongliang Ma; Toncred M Styblo; Cletus A Arciero; Haibo Wang; Michael A Cohen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  How Do We Approach Benign Proliferative Lesions?

Authors:  Faina Nakhlis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Prospective Analysis Using a Novel CNN Algorithm to Distinguish Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in Breast.

Authors:  Simukayi Mutasa; Peter Chang; John Nemer; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Mary Sun; Alison McIlvride; Maham Siddique; Richard Ha
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review.

Authors:  Kelly L Mooney; Lawrence W Bassett; Sophia K Apple
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Active surveillance of women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on core needle biopsy may spare many women potentially unnecessary surgery, but at the risk of undertreatment for a minority: 10-year surgical outcomes of 114 consecutive cases from a single center.

Authors:  Gelareh Farshid; Suzanne Edwards; James Kollias; Peter Grantley Gill
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Long-Term Safety of Observation in Selected Women Following Core Biopsy Diagnosis of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Rhiana S Menen; Nivetha Ganesan; Therese Bevers; Jun Ying; Robin Coyne; Deanna Lane; Constance Albarracin; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Flat epithelial atypia: conservative management of patients without residual microcalcifications post-vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Simone Schiaffino; Licia Gristina; Alessandro Villa; Simona Tosto; Francesco Monetti; Franca Carli; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.