Literature DB >> 20972342

Static foot posture associated with dynamic plantar pressure parameters.

Deydre S Teyhen1, Brian E Stoltenberg, Timothy G Eckard, Peter M Doyle, David M Boland, Jess J Feldtmann, Thomas G McPoil, Douglas S Christie, Joseph M Molloy, Stephen L Goffar.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
OBJECTIVE: To explore potential associations between foot posture index (FPI-6) composite scores and dynamic plantar pressure measurements, and to describe each of the 6 subscales and the FPI-6 composite scores across our sample.
BACKGROUND: The FPI-6 is a static foot posture assessment comprised of 6 observations. Extreme scores have been associated with increased injury risk. However, knowledge describing the relationship between FPI-6 scores and plantar pressure distributions during gait is limited.
METHODS: Participants (n = 1000; 566 males, 434 females) were predominantly active adults (mean ± SD age, 30.6 ± 8.0 years; body mass index, 26.2 ± 3.7 kg/m²), who ran 3.1 ± 1.4 d/wk. Static and dynamic foot characteristics were compared using the FPI-6 and a capacitance-based pressure platform. Correlation and hierarchical stepwise regression analyses were performed to determine the most parsimonious set of dynamic pressure data associated with FPI-6 scores.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD FPI-6 score was 3.4 ± 2.9 (range, -6.0 to 11.0). Only 31 participants received a score of -2 (supinated foot) on any FPI-6 subscale. Classification of a pronated foot was 2.4 times more likely than a supinated foot. A 5-variable model (R = 0.57, R2 = 0.32) was developed to describe the association between dynamic plantar pressures and FPI-6 scores.
CONCLUSION: The multivariate model associated with FPI-6 scores comprised clinically plausible variables which inform the association between static and dynamic foot postures. Different cutoff values may be required when using the FPI-6 to screen for individuals with supinated feet, given the limited number of high-arched participants identified by FPI-6 classifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972342     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  10 in total

1.  Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the five image-based criteria of the foot posture index-6.

Authors:  Masafumi Terada; Ara M Wittwer; Phillip A Gribble
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04

2.  Comparison of plantar-pressure distribution and clinical impact of anatomically shaped sandals, off-the-shelf sandals and normal walking shoes in patients with central metatarsalgia.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Jessica Seegmueller; Axel H Wanivenhaus; Reinhard Windhager; Manuel Sabeti-Aschraf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The outcome of conservative treatment of fifth metatarsal diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  M J Q Steinweg; W Prins; E J Peters; R G Zuurmond
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-08-21

4.  The relationship between foot posture index, ankle equinus, body mass index and intermetatarsal neuroma.

Authors:  Reza Naraghi; Alexandra Bremner; Linda Slack-Smith; Alan Bryant
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Characteristics of the Foot Static Alignment and the Plantar Pressure Associated with Fifth Metatarsal Stress Fracture History in Male Soccer Players: a Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Sho Matsuda; Toru Fukubayashi; Norikazu Hirose
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-08-07

6.  The relationship between foot and ankle joint flexibility measures and barefoot plantar pressures in healthy older adults: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bonnie McNab; Sean Sadler; Sean Lanting; Vivienne Chuter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Spatiotemporal gait parameters and plantar pressure distribution during barefoot walking in people with gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia: comparison with healthy individuals with normal serum urate concentrations.

Authors:  Sarah Stewart; Nicola Dalbeth; Alain C Vandal; Keith Rome
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  The influence of gender and body mass index on the FPI-6 evaluated foot posture of 10- to 14-year-old school children in São Paulo, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Barbarah Kelly Gonçalves de Carvalho; Patrícia Jundi Penha; Nárima Lívia Jundi Penha; Rodrigo Mantelatto Andrade; Ana Paula Ribeiro; Sílvia Maria Amado João
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Characteristics of Plantar Loads During Walking in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Zhiwang Zhang; Lin Wang; Kaijun Hu; Yu Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  An exploratory study investigating the effect of foot type and foot orthoses on gluteus medius muscle activity.

Authors:  Sean Sadler; Martin Spink; Xanne Janse de Jonge; Vivienne Chuter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.