Literature DB >> 25214318

Comparison of plantar-pressure distribution and clinical impact of anatomically shaped sandals, off-the-shelf sandals and normal walking shoes in patients with central metatarsalgia.

Reinhard Schuh1, Jessica Seegmueller, Axel H Wanivenhaus, Reinhard Windhager, Manuel Sabeti-Aschraf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Metatarsalgia is one of the most frequent pathological conditions of the foot and ankle. Numerous studies exist on plantar-pressure characteristics in various types of shoes. However, to the best of our knowledge, plantar-pressure distribution and clinical effects in sandals has not as yet been the the focus of any study.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients (42 feet) with central metatarsalgia were assessed. Time and distance until symptom occurrence in terms of metatarsalgia were evaluated for normal walking shoes (WS), standard sandals (SS) and anatomically shaped, custom-made sandals with a metatarsal pad (AS). Pain intensity was measured with the visual analogue (VAS), and clinical assessment was performed with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score for the respective shoes. Additionally, plantar-pressure distribution was assessed with the emed-at platform (Novel GmbH) and the F-scan insole system (Tekscan Inc.), respectively.
RESULTS: The average walking distance until symptoms occurred was 1,894 m [standard deviation (SD) 1,196 m) for WS, 1,812 m (SD 1,079 m) for SS and 3,407 m (SD 1,817 m) for AS (p < 0.01). Mean duration until occurrence of symptoms was 22.3 min (SD 14.9 min) for the WS, 21.8 min (SD 13.4 min) for the SS and 42.0 min (SD 23.0 min) for the AS (p < 0.01). Plantar-pressure parameters were significantly reduced in the forefoot region for the AS compared with the other walking devices.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal that a modified standard sandal can significantly influence the onset of metatarsalgia, as increased walking time and distance in these patients was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25214318     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2508-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

Review 1.  Plantar pressure assessment.

Authors:  M N Orlin; T G McPoil
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-04

2.  The effect of a long-distance run on plantar pressure distribution during running.

Authors:  Tine Marieke Willems; Roel De Ridder; Philip Roosen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Management of metatarsalgia with foot orthotics.

Authors:  G Doxey
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Measurement of dynamic pressures at the shoe-foot interface during normal walking with various foot orthoses using the FSCAN system.

Authors:  M Brown; S Rudicel; A Esquenazi
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 5.  Metatarsalgia.

Authors:  Norman Espinosa; James W Brodsky; Ernesto Maceira
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Kinematic changes in patients with double arthrodesis of the hindfoot for realignment of planovalgus deformity.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Florian Salzberger; Axel H Wanivenhaus; Philipp T Funovics; Reinhard Windhager; Hans-Joerg Trnka
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Relation between heel position and the distribution of forefoot plantar pressures and skin callosities in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Woodburn; P S Helliwell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Plantar pressure distribution after tibiotalar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Jochen Gerhard Hofstaetter; Stefan Gerhard Hofstaetter; Samual B Adams; Karl-Heinz Kristen; Hans-Joerg Trnka
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems.

Authors:  Karl B Landorf; Joel A Radford; Susie Hudson
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Samra Mian; Tetyana Kendzerska; Melissa French
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of Custom-made Insoles on Plantar Biomechanics and Upper Extremity Muscle Performance.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Qing-Hua Hou; Xiu-Lan Han; Chu-Huai Wang; Dong-Feng Huang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.