Literature DB >> 20969893

Novel methods for quantifying neurophysiologic properties of the human lumbar paraspinal muscles.

David A Goss1, James S Thomas, Brian C Clark.   

Abstract

Our understanding the neurophysiologic characteristics of the human paraspinal muscles has historically been hindered by the lack of experimental techniques to examine these muscles function in vivo. In this article we describe a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol to quantify intracortical facilitation (ICF) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) of the lumbar paraspinal muscles, and an electromechanical tapping protocol to measure the amplitude of the short-latency stretch reflex. Test-retest reliability of these protocols was examined across two sessions separated by 30-min in healthy adults. We assessed relative reliability by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability was assessed via coefficient of variation (CV). ICF and SICI in the lumbar paraspinal muscles exhibited the classical facilitatory and inhibitory responses observed in appendicular skeletal muscles (∼30% facilitation and inhibition, respectively). The motor evoked potential amplitude (MEP), ICF, SICI, and stretch reflex amplitude measurements did not significantly differ between the two testing sessions (p>0.05). The MEP amplitude, ICF and stretch reflex amplitude exhibited the highest relative and absolute reliability (ICC=0.89-0.91, CV=10.6-11.1%); whereas the SICI measure exhibited somewhat lower reliability (ICC=0.75, CV=20.1%). The stretch reflex protocol performed in the first testing session did not influence the TMS outcome measures in the second testing session (p>0.05). These innovative methods may be useful in studying basic physiology, the pathology of low back pain, as well as the mechanisms of action of treatment interventions. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20969893     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  5 in total

1.  A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; David W Russ; Masato Nakazawa; Christopher R France; Stevan Walkowski; Timothy D Law; Megan Applegate; Niladri Mahato; Samuel Lietkam; James Odenthal; Daniel Corcos; Simeon Hain; Betty Sindelar; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; James S Thomas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Utilizing transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the human neuromuscular system.

Authors:  David A Goss; Richard L Hoffman; Brian C Clark
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Lathlean; Akhilesh Kumar Ramachandran; Stephanie Sim; Ian R Whittle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Neurophysiologic effects of spinal manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; David A Goss; Stevan Walkowski; Richard L Hoffman; Andrew Ross; James S Thomas
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Paired-Pulse TMS and Fine-Wire Recordings Reveal Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition and Facilitation of Deep Multifidus Muscle Fascicles.

Authors:  Hugo Massé-Alarie; Edith Elgueta Cancino; Cyril Schneider; Paul Hodges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.