Literature DB >> 20967544

Is there any impact of plasma M30 and M65 levels on progression-free survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer?

Ahmet Bilici1, Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu, Serif Ercan, Asuman Orcun, Mesut Seker, Taflan Salepci, Mahmut Gumus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: M30 and M65 are different circulating fragments of cytokeratin 18. They release during apoptotic cell death, so it is believed that they reflect cell death of epithelial tumors. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of plasma M30 and M65 levels in predicting of survival for patients with advanced gastric cancer compare with healthy controls.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with advanced gastric cancer and thirty-two healthy controls were included. Plasma M30 and M65 values were measured by quantitative ELISA method.
RESULTS: The median age of patients and control groups was 60 and 56 years, respectively. No difference was detected between patient and control groups with respect to plasma median M30 values (390.4 vs. 270.7 U/l, respectively, P = 0.10). The median plasma M65 values of patients were significantly higher than those of control group (1232.1 vs. 580.1 U/l, P < 0.001). The best cut-off values for plasma M30 and M65 for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) were 277.7 and 1434.9 U/l in ROC analysis. The patients whose plasma M30 values were higher than 277.7 U/l had worse PFS than patients with plasma M30 value <277.7 U/l (8.9 vs. 11.2, respectively, P = 0.01). The median PFS of patients whose M65 levels lower than or equal to 1434.9 U/l was better than that of patients whose M65 levels were >1434.9 U/l (12.4 vs. 10.4, respectively, P = 0.04). But plasma M30 and M65 level in patient group were not found to be an important prognostic factor for PFS in the multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that plasma M65 values were significantly elevated in patients with advanced gastric cancer compared to healthy people. Moreover, both increased plasma M30 and M65 levels can predict PFS in patients with gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20967544     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-010-1480-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  9 in total

1.  Serum cytokeratin 18 as a biomarker for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Katsunobu Oyama; Sachio Fushida; Jun Kinoshita; Koichi Okamoto; Isamu Makino; Keishi Nakamura; Hironori Hayashi; Masafumi Inokuchi; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Hidehiro Tajima; Hideto Fujita; Hiroyuki Takamura; Itasu Ninomiya; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Takashi Fujimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  The prognostic significance of the increase in the serum M30 and M65 values after chemotherapy and relationship between these values and clinicopathological factors in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ahmet Bilici; Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu; Serif Ercan; Mesut Seker; Burcak Erkol Yilmaz; Asuman Orcun; Mahmut Gumus
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-08-14

3.  Can circulating M30 and M65 levels be beneficial markers in the diagnosis and management of patients with complete hydatidiform mole?

Authors:  Adnan Incebiyik; Mehmet Vural; Hakan Camuzcuoglu; Abdullah Taskin; Aysun Camuzcuoglu; Nese Gul Hilali; Nurten Aksoy
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Diagnostic value of serum M30 and M65 in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Fatma Sen; Ibrahim Yildiz; Hatice Odabas; Makbule Tambas; Leyla Kilic; Ahmet Karadeniz; Musa Altun; Meltem Ekenel; Murat Serilmez; Derya Duranyildiz; Sevil Bavbek; Mert Basaran
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-18

5.  The prognostic importance of changing serum M30 and M65 values after chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu; Ahmet Bilici; Serif Ercan; Mesut Seker; Asuman Orcun; Mahmut Gumus
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Investigation of bendamustine HCL in a phase 2 study in women with resistant ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Amanda F Baker; Denise J Roe; Cynthia Laughren; Janice L Cohen; Heather M Wright; Mary C Clouser; Haiyan Cui; David S Alberts; Setsuko K Chambers
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Clinical significance of serum M30 and M65 levels in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Faruk Tas; Senem Karabulut; Elif Bilgin; Fatma Sen; Ibrahim Yildiz; Didem Tastekin; Rumeysa Ciftci; Derya Duranyildiz
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-06-21

8.  Prognostic value of non-invasive serum Cytokeratin 18 detection in gastrointestinal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuejuan Huang; Ling Yang; Yan Lin; Xin Chang; Huini Wu; Ying Chen
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  The roles of M30 and M65 in the assessment of treatment response and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, who receive neoadjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Belkıs Nihan Coskun; Oguzhan Sıtkı Dizdar; Seniz Korkmaz; Engin Ulukaya; Turkkan Evrensel
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2019-12-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.