Literature DB >> 20966646

Immunohistology--past, present, and future.

Trishe Y-M Leong1, Kumarasen Cooper, Anthony S-Y Leong.   

Abstract

The rapid development of immunohistochemistry, a morphology-based technique, has come about through refinements in detection systems and an increasing range of sensitive and specific antibodies that have allowed application of the technique to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. The introduction of heat-induced antigen retrieval has been a significant milestone to compliment these developments so that the immunohistochemistry is firmly entrenched as an indispensable adjunct to morphologic diagnosis. Although this ancillary stain was initially used in a qualitative manner, problems surrounding the many variables that influence antigen preservation in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were not a major issue and laboratories strived to optimize their staining protocols to the material they accessioned and processed. The advent of personalized medicine and targeted cancer treatment has imposed the need to quantitate the stain reaction product and has resulted in calls to standardize the process of immunostaining. A closer examination of the variables that influence the ability to show antigens in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues revealed many important variables, particularly in the preanalytical phase of the assay, that are beyond the control of the accessioning laboratory. Although analytical factors have the potential to be standardized, the actions of many pivotal procedures including fixation and antigen retrieval are not completely understood. Postanalytical processes including threshold and cut-off values require consensus and standardization and it is clear that some of these goals can be achieved through the direction of national and international organizations associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment. With the ability to serve as a surrogate marker of many genetic abnormalities, immunohistochemistry enters a new era and the need to better understand some of the mechanisms fundamental to the technique become more pressing and the development of true quantitative assays is imperative. There is also an increasing appreciation that the technique highlights patterns of staining that reflect exquisite localization to organelles and tissue structures that are not appreciable in routine stains, adding a further dimension to morphologic diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20966646     DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181f8957c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol        ISSN: 1072-4109            Impact factor:   3.875


  17 in total

1.  Accuracy and Reproducibility of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry: A Quality Control Study in Tuscany Evaluating the Impact of Updated 2013 ASCO/CAP Recommendations.

Authors:  S Bianchi; S Caini; M Paglierani; C Saieva; V Vezzosi; G Baroni; A Simoni; D Palli
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Application of immunohistochemical staining to detect antigen destruction as a measure of tissue damage.

Authors:  Abdullah Onul; Michael D Colvard; William A Paradise; Kim M Elseth; Benjamin J Vesper; Eftychia Gouvas; Zane Deliu; Kelly D Garcia; William J Pestle; James A Radosevich
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Rita Casadonte; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Aptahistochemistry in diagnostic pathology: technical scrutiny and feasibility.

Authors:  Bakhtiar A Bukari; Marimuthu Citartan; Ewe Seng Ch'ng; Mawethu P Bilibana; Timofey Rozhdestvensky; Thean-Hock Tang
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.304

5.  High-mass-resolution MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of metabolites from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.

Authors:  Alice Ly; Achim Buck; Benjamin Balluff; Na Sun; Karin Gorzolka; Annette Feuchtinger; Klaus-Peter Janssen; Peter J K Kuppen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Gregor Weirich; Franziska Erlmeier; Rupert Langer; Michaela Aubele; Horst Zitzelsberger; Liam McDonnell; Michaela Aichler; Axel Walch
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  [Diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].

Authors:  C Rosamilia; G Feichter; A Tzankov; E C Obermann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  Aptamers and the next generation of diagnostic reagents.

Authors:  Varatharasa Thiviyanathan; David G Gorenstein
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 8.  Immunohistochemistry in Investigative and Toxicologic Pathology.

Authors:  Kyathanahalli S Janardhan; Heather Jensen; Natasha P Clayton; Ronald A Herbert
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 1.902

9.  In situ hybridization protocol for enhanced detection of gene expression in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea.

Authors:  Ryan S King; Phillip A Newmark
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 10.  Revisiting the technical validation of tumour biomarker assays: how to open a Pandora's box.

Authors:  Caterina Marchiò; Mitch Dowsett; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.