G Nagel1, H Concin2, T Bjørge3, K Rapp4, J Manjer5, G Hallmans6, G Diem2, C Häggström7, A Engeland3, M Almquist8, H Jonsson9, R Selmer10, T Stocks7, S Tretli11, H Ulmer12, P Stattin7, A Lukanova13. 1. Institute of Epidemiology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: gabriele.nagel@uni-ulm.de. 2. Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Bregenz, Austria. 3. Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen; Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo/Bergen, Norway. 4. Institute of Epidemiology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. 5. Department of Surgery, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö. 6. Departments of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Nutritional Research. 7. Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå. 8. Department of Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Lund. 9. Department of Radiation Science, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 10. Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo/Bergen, Norway. 11. Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway. 12. Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. 13. Department of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for rare gynecological cancers are largely unknown. Initial research has indicated that the metabolic syndrome (MetS) or individual components could play a role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Metabolic syndrome and Cancer project cohort includes 288,834 women. During an average follow-up of 11 years, 82 vulvar, 26 vaginal and 43 other rare gynecological cancers were identified. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated fitting Cox proportional hazards regression models for tertiles and standardized z-scores [with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation (SD) of 1] of body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides and MetS. Risk estimates were corrected for random error in the measurement of metabolic factors. RESULTS: The MetS was associated with increased risk of vulvar [HR 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-2.41) and vaginal cancer (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.07-3.25). Among separate MetS components, 1 SD increase in BMI was associated with overall risk (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.66), vulvar (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.69) and vaginal cancer (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.30-2.46). Blood glucose and triglyceride concentrations were associated with increased risk of vulvar cancer (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.10-3.58 and HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.39-3.15, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results from this first prospective study on rare gynecological cancers suggest that the MetS and its individual components may play a role in the development of these tumors.
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for rare gynecological cancers are largely unknown. Initial research has indicated that the metabolic syndrome (MetS) or individual components could play a role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Metabolic syndrome and Cancer project cohort includes 288,834 women. During an average follow-up of 11 years, 82 vulvar, 26 vaginal and 43 other rare gynecological cancers were identified. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated fitting Cox proportional hazards regression models for tertiles and standardized z-scores [with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation (SD) of 1] of body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides and MetS. Risk estimates were corrected for random error in the measurement of metabolic factors. RESULTS: The MetS was associated with increased risk of vulvar [HR 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-2.41) and vaginal cancer (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.07-3.25). Among separate MetS components, 1 SD increase in BMI was associated with overall risk (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.66), vulvar (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.69) and vaginal cancer (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.30-2.46). Blood glucose and triglyceride concentrations were associated with increased risk of vulvar cancer (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.10-3.58 and HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.39-3.15, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results from this first prospective study on rare gynecological cancers suggest that the MetS and its individual components may play a role in the development of these tumors.
Authors: Ai Kubo; Michael Blaise Cook; Nicholas J Shaheen; Thomas L Vaughan; David C Whiteman; Liam Murray; Douglas A Corley Journal: Gut Date: 2013-01-26 Impact factor: 23.059