Literature DB >> 20965901

Significance of incidental focal uptake in prostate on 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT images.

E J Han1, J H O, W H Choi, I R Yoo, S K Chung.   

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical significance of incidental focal prostate fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake, we reviewed 18-F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans from 2003 to 2007 and selected cases with focal FDG uptake in prostate. Cases of known prostate cancer were excluded. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUV(max)), site (central or peripheral) and pattern (discrete or ill-defined) of FDG uptake, calcification (present or absent) and prostate volume (<30 or ≥30 cc) were recorded. The PET/CT findings were correlated with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, imaging studies, clinical follow-up and biopsy. Of a total of 5119 cases, 63 (1.2%) demonstrated focal FDG uptake in prostate. Eight cases were lost to follow-up. Among the 55 cases with follow-up, malignancy was confirmed by biopsy in 3 (5.4%). The three malignant cases had SUV(max) values of 3.3, 3.6 and 2.3, and all were noted in the peripheral portion of prostate; two of these cases had a discrete FDG uptake pattern, none had calcification corresponding to the FDG uptake area and one had a prostatic volume greater than 30 cc. The mean SUV(max) of 52 benign cases was 3.2 ± 1.7 and focal FDG uptake was noted in the peripheral portion in 34 (65%), 20 (38%) cases showed a discrete FDG uptake pattern, 35 (67%) were accompanied by calcification and 32 (62%) had a prostatic volume greater than 30 cc. The majority of cases demonstrating focal FDG uptake in prostate were benign and no PET/CT finding could reliably differentiate benign from malignant lesions; however, when discrete focal FDG uptake without coincidental calcification is seen, particularly in the peripheral zone of the prostate, further clinical evaluation is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20965901      PMCID: PMC3473727          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/19887771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  37 in total

Review 1.  Molecular markers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark A Reynolds; Kumar Kastury; Jack Groskopf; Jack A Schalken; Harry Rittenhouse
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computerized tomography of urological malignancies: an update review.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Peter Oehr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers.

Authors:  K Facey; I Bradbury; G Laking; E Payne
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  High-grade urothelial carcinoma of the prostate on FDG PET-CT.

Authors:  Linh Ho; Vicki Quan; Robert Henderson; John Seto
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.794

5.  Incidence and significance of prostatic stones in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel A Shoskes; Chun-Te Lee; Donel Murphy; John Kefer; Hadley M Wood
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  M Fuchsjäger; A Shukla-Dave; O Akin; J Barentsz; H Hricak
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Performance profile of FDG-PET and PET/CT for cancer screening on the basis of a Japanese Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Michio Senda; Kimiichi Uno; Seishi Jinnouchi; Takeshi Iinuma; Kengo Ito; Chio Okuyama; Kazuhiro Oguchi; Masami Kawamoto; Yutaka Suzuki; Eriko Tsukamoto; Takashi Terauchi; Rumi Nakashima; Masami Nishio; Sadahiko Nishizawa; Hiroshi Fukuda; Tsuyoshi Yoshida; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 8.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Steven A Leibel; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  The roles of PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nobukazu Takahashi; Tomio Inoue; Jin Lee; Takako Yamaguchi; Kazuya Shizukuishi
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 2.935

10.  Cancer screening of healthy volunteers using whole-body 18F-FDG-PET scans: The Nishidai clinic study.

Authors:  Shinsuke Kojima; Bin Zhou; Satoshi Teramukai; Akiko Hara; Noboru Kosaka; Yoshitomo Matsuo; Hitoshi Suzuki; Soichiro Torigoe; Takayuki Suzuki; Kimiichi Uno; Masanori Fukushima
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  22 in total

1.  Incidental fleurodeoxyglucose uptake in the prostate.

Authors:  W L Wong; R N Moule; T Nunan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Multicentre study of 18F-FDG-PET/CT prostate incidental uptake.

Authors:  Francesco Bertagna; Arnoldo Piccardo; Bassam Dib; Mattia Bertoli; Federica Fracassi; Giovanni Bosio; Raffaele Giubbini; Giorgio Biasiotto; Luca Giovanella; Giorgio Treglia
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Case: Incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography prostate uptake: How should these patients be managed?

Authors:  Anne Couture; Mounsif Azizi; Daniel Taussky; Michael McCormack
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Clinical significance of incidental FDG uptake in the prostate gland detected by PET/CT.

Authors:  Ertan Sahin; Umut Elboga; Ebuzer Kalender; Mustafa Basıbuyuk; Hasan Deniz Demir; Yusuf Zeki Celen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

6.  Incidental Focal (18)F-FDG Uptake in the Prostate: Clinical Significance and Differential Diagnostic Criteria.

Authors:  Suk Kyong Cho; Joon Young Choi; Jang Yoo; Miju Cheon; Ji Young Lee; Seung Hyup Hyun; Eun Jeong Lee; Kyung-Han Lee; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07-06

7.  Granulomatous Prostatitis After Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Instillation Therapy: A Potential Cause of Incidental F-18 FDG Uptake in the Prostate Gland on F-18 FDG PET/CT in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Choon-Young Kim; Sang-Woo Lee; Seock Hwan Choi; Seung Hyun Son; Ji-Hoon Jung; Chang-Hee Lee; Shin Young Jeong; Byeong-Cheol Ahn; Jaetae Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-09-11

8.  Does focal incidental 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake in the prostate have significance?

Authors:  Anna M Brown; Maria L Lindenberg; Sandeep Sankineni; Joanna H Shih; Linda M Johnson; Suneha Pruthy; Karen A Kurdziel; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

9.  Incidentalomas of the prostate detected by 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Miles P Mannas; Taeweon Lee; Maral Pourghiasian; Don C Wilson; Peter C Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  FDG PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Valuable Method to Detect the Primary and Metastatic Tumor Sites and to Monitor Cancer Response to Hormonal Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Hinev; Borislav Chaushev; Aneliya Klisarova
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2012-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.