A novel crossed rod configuration incorporating translaminar screws for occipitocervical internal fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Occipitocervical (OC) spinal instrumentation involving the axis (C2) entails the use of transarticular screws through C1-C2 or lateral mass screws at C1 and pedicle screws at C2 to achieve fusion. Because of the anatomical complexity, interpatient anomalous variation, and danger to the vertebral artery injury, there has been an increased interest in alternate sites for fixation. Recent studies have involved the placement of screws bilaterally into the C2 lamina. Several biomechanical studies have been carried out to evaluate the performance of C2 translaminar screws (TLSs).
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare the biomechanics of an OC2 rigid construct using C2 pedicle screws and C2 TLSs. Also, this study included a new construct in which the OC2 fixation was carried out by connecting rods to the contralateral TLS. STUDY
DESIGN: Human cadaveric cervical spines were tested in an in vitro biomechanical flexibility experiment to investigate the biomechanical stability provided by a novel crossed rod (CR) configuration incorporating TLSs for OC2 internal fixation.
METHODS: Seven fresh human cadaver occipitocervical spines (occiput-C3) were tested by applying pure moments of ±1.5 Nm. After intact specimen testing, an occipital plate was implanted. Each specimen was then tested in the following modes: bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) and rods at C2; TLSs at C2 with rods in parallel configuration (TLS+parallel rod); and TLSs at C2 with rods in crossed configuration (TLS+CR). OC2 range of motion (ROM) for each construct was obtained by applying pure moments in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.
RESULTS: All three instrumented constructs significantly reduced ROM in all physiological planes when compared with the intact spine. The BPS construct similarly reduced ROM when compared with both the translaminar constructs. There was no significant difference in ROM between the translaminar constructs in all loading modes.
CONCLUSIONS: A cadaveric model was used to investigate the stability offered by a novel CR construct by using TLS fixation in an OC2 fusion construct. The results were compared with BPS fixation. All three constructs significantly decreased motion as compared with the intact state. There was no statistically significant difference in flexibility among any of the constructs. The novel CR construct provides as much stability as traditional constructs and may be a viable alternative for clinical use.