Lucas J Carr1, Shira I Dunsiger, Bess H Marcus. 1. Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. carrl@ecu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Walk Score recently has been demonstrated as a valid and reliable tool for estimating access to nearby facilities, a critical component of the physical activity environment. It has not yet been determined whether Walk Score relates to other critical components of the physical activity environment, including street connectivity, access to public transit, residential density, and crime. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between Walk Score and objective/subjective measures of the physical activity environment. METHODS: Walk Scores were calculated for residential addresses of 296 participants of two RCTs (2006-2009). Street connectivity, residential density, access to public transit provisions, and crime were objectively measured (GIS) and cross-referenced with Walk Scores and participant's perceptions of the environment (e.g., perceived crime, access to physical activity facilities, perceived neighborhood walkability). Pairwise Pearson correlations were calculated in March 2010 to compare Walk Score to subjective/objective measures of neighborhood walkability. RESULTS: Significant positive correlations were identified between Walk Score and several objective (e.g., street connectivity, residential density and access to public transit provisions) and subjective (e.g., summed score of the physical activity environment) measures of the physical activity environment. However, positive correlations also were observed between Walk Score and crime. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings support Walk Score as a free, easy-to-use, and quick proxy of neighborhood density and access to nearby amenities. However, positive associations between Walk Score and reported crime highlight a limitation of Walk Score and warrant caution of its use.
BACKGROUND: Walk Score recently has been demonstrated as a valid and reliable tool for estimating access to nearby facilities, a critical component of the physical activity environment. It has not yet been determined whether Walk Score relates to other critical components of the physical activity environment, including street connectivity, access to public transit, residential density, and crime. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between Walk Score and objective/subjective measures of the physical activity environment. METHODS: Walk Scores were calculated for residential addresses of 296 participants of two RCTs (2006-2009). Street connectivity, residential density, access to public transit provisions, and crime were objectively measured (GIS) and cross-referenced with Walk Scores and participant's perceptions of the environment (e.g., perceived crime, access to physical activity facilities, perceived neighborhood walkability). Pairwise Pearson correlations were calculated in March 2010 to compare Walk Score to subjective/objective measures of neighborhood walkability. RESULTS: Significant positive correlations were identified between Walk Score and several objective (e.g., street connectivity, residential density and access to public transit provisions) and subjective (e.g., summed score of the physical activity environment) measures of the physical activity environment. However, positive correlations also were observed between Walk Score and crime. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings support Walk Score as a free, easy-to-use, and quick proxy of neighborhood density and access to nearby amenities. However, positive associations between Walk Score and reported crime highlight a limitation of Walk Score and warrant caution of its use.
Authors: Karen A Kirtland; Dwayne E Porter; Cheryl L Addy; Matthew J Neet; Joel E Williams; Patricia A Sharpe; Linda J Neff; C Dexter Kimsey; Barbara E Ainsworth Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Dorothy W Pekmezi; Charles J Neighbors; Christina S Lee; Kim M Gans; Beth C Bock; Kathleen M Morrow; Becky Marquez; Shira Dunsiger; Bess H Marcus Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kylie Ball; Robert W Jeffery; David A Crawford; Rebecca J Roberts; Jo Salmon; Anna F Timperio Journal: Prev Med Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Glen E Duncan; Ally Avery; Philip M Hurvitz; Anne Vernez Moudon; Siny Tsang; Eric Turkheimer Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Lindsay M Braun; Daniel A Rodríguez; Kelly R Evenson; Jana A Hirsch; Kari A Moore; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: Health Place Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Jana A Hirsch; Ana V Diez Roux; Kari A Moore; Kelly R Evenson; Daniel A Rodriguez Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ryan E R Reid; Tamara E Carver; Tyler G R Reid; Marie-Aude Picard-Turcot; Kathleen M Andersen; Nicolas V Christou; Ross E Andersen Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.129