Literature DB >> 20965364

Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle.

Z Zhang1, T Druet.   

Abstract

The availability of high-density bovine genotyping arrays made implementation of genomic selection possible in dairy cattle. Development of low-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels will allow the extension of genomic selection to a larger portion of the population. Prediction of ungenotyped markers, called imputation, is a strategy that allows using the same low-density chips for all traits (and for different breeds). In the present study, we evaluated the accuracy of imputation with low-density genotyping arrays in the Dutch Holstein population. Five different sizes of genotyping arrays were tested, from 384 to 6,000 SNP. According to marker density, the overall allelic imputation error rate obtained with the program DAGPHASE, which relies on linkage disequilibrium and linkage, ranged from 11.7 to 2.0%, and that obtained with the program CHROMIBD, which relies on linkage and the set of all genotyped ancestors, ranged from 10.7 to 3.3%. However, imputation efficiency was influenced by the relationship between low-density and high-density genotyped animals. Animals with both parents genotyped had particularly low imputation error rates: <1% with 1,500 SNP or more. In summary, missing marker alleles can be predicted with 3 to 4% errors with approximately 1 SNP/Mb (approximately 3,000 markers). The CHROMIBD program proved more efficient than DAGPHASE only at lower marker densities or when several genotyped ancestors were available. Future studies are required to measure the effect of these imputation error rates on accuracy of genomic selection with low-density SNP panels.
Copyright © 2010 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20965364     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  42 in total

1.  Modeling of identity-by-descent processes along a chromosome between haplotypes and their genotyped ancestors.

Authors:  Tom Druet; Frederic Paul Farnir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1.

Authors:  Aine C O'Brien; Michelle M Judge; Sean Fair; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.

Authors:  Bruna P Sollero; Jeremy T Howard; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States.

Authors:  Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Assessing single-nucleotide polymorphism selection methods for the development of a low-density panel optimized for imputation in South African Drakensberger beef cattle.

Authors:  Simon F Lashmar; Donagh P Berry; Rian Pierneef; Farai C Muchadeyi; Carina Visser
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genotype imputation accuracy in a F2 pig population using high density and low density SNP panels.

Authors:  Jose L Gualdrón Duarte; Ronald O Bates; Catherine W Ernst; Nancy E Raney; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Application of imputation methods to genomic selection in Chinese Holstein cattle.

Authors:  Ziqing Weng; Zhe Zhang; Xiangdong Ding; Weixuan Fu; Peipei Ma; Chonglong Wang; Qin Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-29

8.  Assessment of alternative genotyping strategies to maximize imputation accuracy at minimal cost.

Authors:  Yijian Huang; John M Hickey; Matthew A Cleveland; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Comparison of different imputation methods from low- to high-density panels using Chinese Holstein cattle.

Authors:  Z Weng; Z Zhang; Q Zhang; W Fu; S He; X Ding
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Mehar S Khatkar; Gerhard Moser; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.