Primoz Markelj1, Bostjan Likar, Franjo Pernus. 1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Trzaska 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. primoz.markelj@fe.uni-lj.si
Abstract
PURPOSE: A new image database with a reference-based standardized evaluation methodology for objective evaluation and comparison of three-dimensional/two-dimensional (3D/2D) registration methods has been introduced. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a male and female from the Visible Human Project were used and 16 subvolumes, each containing one of vertebrae T3-T12 and L1-L5 and the pelvis, were defined from the CTs. Six pairs of 2D fluoroscopic x-ray images from different views, showing the thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic regions, were rendered from the CT data using a ray-casting algorithm with an energy conversion function. Furthermore, a single 13-gauge needle was analytically simulated and projected onto the 2D images. By the novel standardized evaluation methodology, a 3D/2D registration method is evaluated by four evaluation criteria: Accuracy, reliability, robustness, and algorithm complexity. RESULTS: To demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed data set and the standardized evaluation methodology, a part of the data set was used in an evaluation study of two gradient-based 3D/2D registration methods. It was shown that the use of a failure criterion to calculate the registration accuracy and reliability is not required, since all the information about a registration method can be determined from the estimated distribution of registration errors. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed simulated image data set with quite realistic synthetic 2D images, depicting soft tissues and outliers, is especially suitable for preliminary testing of 3D/2D registration algorithms. Since the aim of this article is to provide objective comparison and unbiased evaluation of 3D/2D registration methods, the standardized evaluation methodology is available upon request from the authors.
PURPOSE: A new image database with a reference-based standardized evaluation methodology for objective evaluation and comparison of three-dimensional/two-dimensional (3D/2D) registration methods has been introduced. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a male and female from the Visible Human Project were used and 16 subvolumes, each containing one of vertebrae T3-T12 and L1-L5 and the pelvis, were defined from the CTs. Six pairs of 2D fluoroscopic x-ray images from different views, showing the thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic regions, were rendered from the CT data using a ray-casting algorithm with an energy conversion function. Furthermore, a single 13-gauge needle was analytically simulated and projected onto the 2D images. By the novel standardized evaluation methodology, a 3D/2D registration method is evaluated by four evaluation criteria: Accuracy, reliability, robustness, and algorithm complexity. RESULTS: To demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed data set and the standardized evaluation methodology, a part of the data set was used in an evaluation study of two gradient-based 3D/2D registration methods. It was shown that the use of a failure criterion to calculate the registration accuracy and reliability is not required, since all the information about a registration method can be determined from the estimated distribution of registration errors. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed simulated image data set with quite realistic synthetic 2D images, depicting soft tissues and outliers, is especially suitable for preliminary testing of 3D/2D registration algorithms. Since the aim of this article is to provide objective comparison and unbiased evaluation of 3D/2D registration methods, the standardized evaluation methodology is available upon request from the authors.
Authors: Christelle Gendrin; Primoz Markelj; Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro; Jakob Spoerk; Christoph Bloch; Christoph Weber; Michael Figl; Helmar Bergmann; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Bostjan Likar; Franjo Pernus Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Robert B Grupp; Rachel A Hegeman; Ryan J Murphy; Clayton P Alexander; Yoshito Otake; Benjamin A McArthur; Mehran Armand; Russell H Taylor Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: S A Pawiro; P Markelj; F Pernus; C Gendrin; M Figl; C Weber; F Kainberger; I Nöbauer-Huhmann; H Bergmeister; M Stock; D Georg; H Bergmann; W Birkfellner Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.071