Literature DB >> 27653616

A framework for automatic creation of gold-standard rigid 3D-2D registration datasets.

Hennadii Madan1, Franjo Pernuš2, Boštjan Likar2, Žiga Špiclin2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Advanced image-guided medical procedures incorporate 2D intra-interventional information into pre-interventional 3D image and plan of the procedure through 3D/2D image registration (32R). To enter clinical use, and even for publication purposes, novel and existing 32R methods have to be rigorously validated. The performance of a 32R method can be estimated by comparing it to an accurate reference or gold standard method (usually based on fiducial markers) on the same set of images (gold standard dataset). Objective validation and comparison of methods are possible only if evaluation methodology is standardized, and the gold standard  dataset is made publicly available. Currently, very few such datasets exist and only one contains images of multiple patients acquired during a procedure. To encourage the creation of gold standard 32R datasets, we propose an automatic framework.
METHODS: The framework is based on rigid registration of fiducial markers. The main novelty is spatial grouping of fiducial markers on the carrier device, which enables automatic marker localization and identification across the 3D and 2D images.
RESULTS: The proposed framework was demonstrated on clinical angiograms of 20 patients. Rigid 32R computed by the framework was more accurate than that obtained manually, with the respective target registration error below 0.027 mm compared to 0.040 mm.
CONCLUSION: The framework is applicable for gold standard setup on any rigid anatomy, provided that the acquired images contain spatially grouped fiducial markers. The gold standard datasets and software will be made publicly available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-arm; Endovascular; Fiducial marker; Gold standard; Image guidance; Registration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27653616     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-016-1482-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  31 in total

Review 1.  A survey of medical image registration.

Authors:  J B Maintz; M A Viergever
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Recovering the X-ray projection geometry for three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction with additional sensors: attached camera versus external navigation system.

Authors:  M Mitschke; N Navab
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Camera augmented mobile C-arm (CAMC): calibration, accuracy study, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Nassir Navab; Sandro-Michael Heining; Joerg Traub
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  "Gold standard" data for evaluation and comparison of 3D/2D registration methods.

Authors:  Dejan Tomazevic; Bostjan Likar; Franjo Pernus
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2004

5.  Medical technology integration: CT, angiography, imaging-capable OR-table, navigation and robotics in a multifunctional sterile suite.

Authors:  A L Jacob; P Regazzoni; D Bilecen; M Rasmus; R W Huegli; P Messmer
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.442

6.  Fast internal marker tracking algorithm for onboard MV and kV imaging systems.

Authors:  W Mao; R D Wiersma; L Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  MRI to X-ray mammography intensity-based registration with simultaneous optimisation of pose and biomechanical transformation parameters.

Authors:  Thomy Mertzanidou; John Hipwell; Stian Johnsen; Lianghao Han; Bjoern Eiben; Zeike Taylor; Sebastien Ourselin; Henkjan Huisman; Ritse Mann; Ulrich Bick; Nico Karssemeijer; David Hawkes
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Oriented Gaussian mixture models for nonrigid 2D/3D coronary artery registration.

Authors:  N Baka; C T Metz; C J Schultz; R-J van Geuns; W J Niessen; T van Walsum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Incorporating Target Registration Error Into Robotic Bone Milling.

Authors:  Michael A Siebold; Neal P Dillon; Robert J Webster; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-02-21

10.  Validation for 2D/3D registration. I: A new gold standard data set.

Authors:  S A Pawiro; P Markelj; F Pernus; C Gendrin; M Figl; C Weber; F Kainberger; I Nöbauer-Huhmann; H Bergmeister; M Stock; D Georg; H Bergmann; W Birkfellner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  3D-2D registration in endovascular image-guided surgery: evaluation of state-of-the-art methods on cerebral angiograms.

Authors:  Uroš Mitrović; Boštjan Likar; Franjo Pernuš; Žiga Špiclin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A new 2D-3D registration gold-standard dataset for the hip joint based on uncertainty modeling.

Authors:  Fabio D'Isidoro; Christophe Chênes; Stephen J Ferguson; Jérôme Schmid
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.