Literature DB >> 20963551

Using simulation-optimization to construct screening strategies for cervical cancer.

Laura A McLay1, Christodoulos Foufoulides, Jason R W Merrick.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide. Cervical screening is critical for preventing this type of cancer. Traditionally, screening strategies are evaluated from an economic point of view through cost-effectiveness analysis. However, cost-effectiveness analysis is typically performed on a limited number of de facto or predetermined screening policies. We develop a simulation-optimization model to determine the ages at which screening should be performed, resulting in dynamic, age-based screening policies. We consider three performance measures: cervical cancer incidence, the number of cervical cancer deaths, and the number of life years lost due to cervical cancer death. Using each performance measure, we compare our optimal, dynamic screening strategies to standard policies considered in the health screening literature that are static and predetermined. We also evaluate the anticipated impact of vaccinations for preventing cervical cancer. The strategies that are developed are compared to those used in practice or considered in the literature. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends one screening every 3 years, resulting in 14 scheduled lifetime screenings. Our dynamic screening strategies provide approximately the same health benefits as this but with four to six fewer scheduled screenings, depending on the performance measure considered. Our dynamic strategies also provide approximately the same health benefits as screening every 2 years, but with six to nine fewer scheduled screenings. The results suggest that dynamic, age-based cervical cancer screening policies offer substantial economic savings in order to offer the same health benefits as equally spaced screening strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20963551     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-010-9131-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  24 in total

1.  Costs and effectiveness of alternative strategies for cervical cancer screening in military beneficiaries.

Authors:  G Larry Maxwell; Jay W Carlson; Mark Ochoa; Tom Krivak; G Scott Rose; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The German cervical cancer screening model: development and validation of a decision-analytic model for cervical cancer screening in Germany.

Authors:  Uwe Siebert; Gaby Sroczynski; Peter Hillemanns; Jutta Engel; Roland Stabenow; Christa Stegmaier; Kerstin Voigt; Bernhard Gibis; Dieter Hölzel; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; William F Lawrence; Sharita Mizell Womack; Denise Jacobson; Bin Yi; Yi-ting Hwang; Karen Gold; James Barter; Keerti Shah
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Optimization of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; H O Adami
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Evaluating screening policies for the early detection of retinopathy in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes.

Authors:  S C Brailsford; R Davies; C Canning; P J Roderick
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1998-10

6.  Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests.

Authors:  Shalini L Kulasingam; Evan R Myers; Herschel W Lawson; K John McConnell; Karla Kerlikowske; Joy Melnikow; A Eugene Washington; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Diagnostic assessments in patients with invasive cancer of the cervix: a national patterns of care study of the American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  A H Russell; H M Shingleton; W B Jones; A Fremgen; D P Winchester; R Clive; J S Chmiel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Multiparameter calibration of a natural history model of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Karen M Kuntz; Natasha K Stout; Salaheddin Mahmud; Luisa L Villa; Eduardo L Franco; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Mathematical models for the early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P R Harper; S K Jones
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-05

10.  Breast cancer screening services: trade-offs in quality, capacity, outreach, and centralization.

Authors:  Evrim D Güneş; Stephen E Chick; O Zeynep Akşin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.