Literature DB >> 20962776

Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.

C A Umscheid1.   

Abstract

Providers, consumers, payers, and policy makers are awash in choices when it comes to medical decision making and need better evidence to inform their decisions. Large federal investments in comparative effectiveness research (CER) aim to fill this need. But how do we ensure the clinical utility of CER? Here, I define comparative effectiveness and clinical utility, outline metrics to evaluate clinical utility, and suggest methods for maximizing the clinical utility of CER for the various stakeholders.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20962776     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2010.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  2 in total

Review 1.  To Utility and Beyond! Specifying and Advancing the Utility of Measurement-Based Care for Youth.

Authors:  Bryce D McLeod; Amanda Jensen-Doss; Aaron R Lyon; Susan Douglas; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2022-03-09

2.  Comparative effectiveness research of chronic hepatitis B and C cohort study (CHeCS): improving data collection and cohort identification.

Authors:  Mei Lu; Loralee B Rupp; Anne C Moorman; Jia Li; Talan Zhang; Lois E Lamerato; Scott D Holmberg; Philip R Spradling; Eyasu H Teshale; Vinutha Vijayadeva; Joseph A Boscarino; Mark A Schmidt; David R Nerenz; Stuart C Gordon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.