Literature DB >> 35263198

To Utility and Beyond! Specifying and Advancing the Utility of Measurement-Based Care for Youth.

Bryce D McLeod1, Amanda Jensen-Doss2, Aaron R Lyon3, Susan Douglas4, Rinad S Beidas5,6.   

Abstract

Mental health organizations that serve youth are under pressure to adopt measurement-based care (MBC), defined as the continuous collection of client-report data used to support clinical decision-making as part of standard care. However, few frameworks exist to help leadership ascertain how to select an MBC approach for a clinical setting. This paper seeks to define how an MBC approach can display clinical utility to provide such a framework. Broadly, we define clinical utility as evidence that an MBC approach assists stakeholders in fulfilling clinical goals related to care quality (i.e., improve client-clinician alliance and clinical outcomes) at the client (i.e., youth and caregiver), clinician, supervisor, and administrator levels. More specifically, our definition of clinical utility is divided into two categories relevant to the usability and usefulness of an MBC approach for a specific setting: (a) implementability (i.e., evidence indicating ease of use in a clinical setting) and (b) usefulness in aiding clinical activities (i.e., evidence indicating the potential to improve communication and make clinical activities related to care quality easier or more effective). These categories provide valuable information about how easy an MBC approach is to use and the potential benefits that the MBC data will confer. To detail how we arrived at this definition, we review prior definitions of clinical utility, discuss how previous definitions inform our definition of clinical utility for MBC, and provide examples of how the concept of clinical utility can be applied to MBC. We finish with a discussion of future research directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35263198      PMCID: PMC9246828          DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2042698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol        ISSN: 1537-4416


  52 in total

1.  Assessing the costs, benefits, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit of psychological assessment: we should, we can, and here's how.

Authors:  Brian T Yates; Jennifer Taub
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses.

Authors:  Michael B First; Harold Alan Pincus; John B Levine; Janet B W Williams; Bedirhan Ustun; Roger Peele
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 3.  Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: A multilevel meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kim de Jong; Judith M Conijn; Roisin A V Gallagher; Alexandra S Reshetnikova; Marya Heij; Miranda C Lutz
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-02-27

4.  What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare?

Authors:  Paul B Batalden; Frank Davidoff
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-02

5.  Using Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Any Treatment.

Authors:  Kelli Scott; Cara C Lewis
Journal:  Cogn Behav Pract       Date:  2015-02

6.  Use of outcome measurements in clinical practice: How specific should one be?

Authors:  M Annet Nugter; Marleen L M Hermens; Sylvana Robbers; Gabrielle Van Son; Jan Theunissen; Fabiana Engelsbel
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2017-12-03

7.  Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses.

Authors:  Robert Kendell; Assen Jablensky
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Transforming Mental Health Care Delivery Through Implementation Science and Behavioral Economics.

Authors:  Rinad S Beidas; Alison M Buttenheim; David S Mandell
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 25.911

9.  Lessons From Maslow: Prioritizing Funding to Improve the Quality of Community Mental Health and Substance Use Services.

Authors:  Rebecca E Stewart; David S Mandell; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health.

Authors:  Cara C Lewis; Meredith R Boyd; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Aaron R Lyon; Rinad Beidas; Brian Mittman; Gregory A Aarons; Bryan J Weiner; David A Chambers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.