BACKGROUND: Energy intake (EI) during weight loss is difficult and costly to measure accurately. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop and validate a computational energy balance differential equation model to determine individual EI during weight loss. DESIGN: An algorithm was developed to quantify EI during weight loss based on a validated one-dimensional model for weight change. By using data from a 24-wk calorie-restriction study, we tested the validity of the EI model against 2 criterion measures: 1) EI quantified through food provision from weeks 0-4 and 4-12 and 2) EI quantified through changes in body energy stores [measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)] and energy expenditure [measured with doubly labeled water (DLW)] from weeks 4-12 and 12-24. RESULTS: Compared with food provision, the mean (±SD) model errors were 41 ± 118 kcal/d and -22 ± 230 kcal/d from weeks 0-4 and 4-12, respectively. Compared with EI measured with DXA and DLW, the model errors were -71 ± 272 kcal/d and -48 ± 226 kcal/d from weeks 4-12 and 12-24, respectively. In every comparison, the mean error was never significantly different from zero (P values > 0.10). Furthermore, Bland and Altman analysis indicated that error variance did not differ significantly over amounts of EI (P values > 0.26). Almost all individual participants' values were within CI limits. CONCLUSION: The validity of the newly developed EI model was supported by experimental observations and can be used to determine an individual participant's EI during weight loss.
BACKGROUND: Energy intake (EI) during weight loss is difficult and costly to measure accurately. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop and validate a computational energy balance differential equation model to determine individual EI during weight loss. DESIGN: An algorithm was developed to quantify EI during weight loss based on a validated one-dimensional model for weight change. By using data from a 24-wk calorie-restriction study, we tested the validity of the EI model against 2 criterion measures: 1) EI quantified through food provision from weeks 0-4 and 4-12 and 2) EI quantified through changes in body energy stores [measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)] and energy expenditure [measured with doubly labeled water (DLW)] from weeks 4-12 and 12-24. RESULTS: Compared with food provision, the mean (±SD) model errors were 41 ± 118 kcal/d and -22 ± 230 kcal/d from weeks 0-4 and 4-12, respectively. Compared with EI measured with DXA and DLW, the model errors were -71 ± 272 kcal/d and -48 ± 226 kcal/d from weeks 4-12 and 12-24, respectively. In every comparison, the mean error was never significantly different from zero (P values > 0.10). Furthermore, Bland and Altman analysis indicated that error variance did not differ significantly over amounts of EI (P values > 0.26). Almost all individual participants' values were within CI limits. CONCLUSION: The validity of the newly developed EI model was supported by experimental observations and can be used to determine an individual participant's EI during weight loss.
Authors: Lilian de Jonge; James P DeLany; Tuong Nguyen; Jennifer Howard; Evan C Hadley; Leanne M Redman; Eric Ravussin Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: S B Heymsfield; D Thomas; A M Nguyen; J Z Peng; C Martin; W Shen; B Strauss; A Bosy-Westphal; M J Muller Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Leonie K Heilbronn; Lilian de Jonge; Madlyn I Frisard; James P DeLany; D Enette Larson-Meyer; Jennifer Rood; Tuong Nguyen; Corby K Martin; Julia Volaufova; Marlene M Most; Frank L Greenway; Steven R Smith; Walter A Deutsch; Donald A Williamson; Eric Ravussin Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Diana M Thomas; Corby K Martin; Steven Heymsfield; Leanne M Redman; Dale A Schoeller; James A Levine Journal: J Biol Dyn Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Leanne M Redman; Leonie K Heilbronn; Corby K Martin; Lilian de Jonge; Donald A Williamson; James P Delany; Eric Ravussin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Susan B Racette; Sai Krupa Das; Manjushri Bhapkar; Evan C Hadley; Susan B Roberts; Eric Ravussin; Carl Pieper; James P DeLany; William E Kraus; James Rochon; Leanne M Redman Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Robin P Shook; Gregory A Hand; Clemens Drenowatz; James R Hebert; Amanda E Paluch; John E Blundell; James O Hill; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Timothy S Church; Steven N Blair Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; Corby K Martin; Robert L Newton; John W Apolzan; Connie L Arnold; Terry C Davis; Kara D Denstel; Emily F Mire; Tina K Thethi; Phillip J Brantley; William D Johnson; Vivian Fonseca; Jonathan Gugel; Kathleen B Kennedy; Carl J Lavie; Eboni G Price-Haywood; Daniel F Sarpong; Benjamin Springgate Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: S R J Zinkel; R I Berkowitz; A J Stunkard; V A Stallings; M Faith; D Thomas; D A Schoeller Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: John A Dawson; Kevin D Hall; Diana M Thomas; James W Hardin; David B Allison; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 8.701