Literature DB >> 20962124

Impact of health information technology interventions to improve medication laboratory monitoring for ambulatory patients: a systematic review.

Shira H Fischer1, Jennifer Tjia, Terry S Field.   

Abstract

Medication errors are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Inadequate laboratory monitoring of high-risk medications after initial prescription is a medical error that contributes to preventable adverse drug events. Health information technology (HIT)-based clinical decision support may improve patient safety by improving the laboratory monitoring of high-risk medications, but the effectiveness of such interventions is unclear. Therefore, the authors conducted a systematic review to identify studies that evaluate the independent effect of HIT interventions on improving laboratory monitoring for high-risk medications in the ambulatory setting using a Medline search from January 1, 1980 through January 1, 2009 and a manual review of relevant bibliographies. All anticoagulation monitoring studies were excluded. Eight articles met the inclusion criteria, including six randomized controlled trials and two pre-post intervention studies. Six of the studies were conducted in two large, integrated healthcare delivery systems in the USA. Overall, five of the eight studies reported statistically significant, but small, improvements in laboratory monitoring; only half of the randomized controlled trials reported statistically significant improvements. Studies that found no improvement were more likely to have used analytic strategies that addressed clustering and confounding. Whether HIT improves laboratory monitoring of certain high-risk medications for ambulatory patients remains unclear, and further research is needed to clarify this important question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20962124      PMCID: PMC3000763          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  31 in total

1.  A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support.

Authors:  Jerome A Osheroff; Jonathan M Teich; Blackford Middleton; Elaine B Steen; Adam Wright; Don E Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  A systematic review of the performance characteristics of clinical event monitor signals used to detect adverse drug events in the hospital setting.

Authors:  Steven M Handler; Richard L Altman; Subashan Perera; Joseph T Hanlon; Stephanie A Studenski; James E Bost; Melissa I Saul; Douglas B Fridsma
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Christof Machan; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jesse I Wolfstadt; Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Monica Lee; Sunila Kalkar; Wei Wu; Paula A Rochon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review.

Authors:  Gilad J Kuperman; Anne Bobb; Thomas H Payne; Anthony J Avery; Tejal K Gandhi; Gerard Burns; David C Classen; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Improved therapeutic monitoring with several interventions: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; David H Smith; Nancy Perrin; Xiuhai Yang; Mary Rix; Marsha A Raebel; David J Magid; Steven R Simon; Stephen B Soumerai
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-09-25

7.  Impact of non-interruptive medication laboratory monitoring alerts in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Helen G Lo; Michael E Matheny; Diane L Seger; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Systematic review of the incidence and characteristics of preventable adverse drug events in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Linda Aagaard Thomsen; Almut G Winterstein; Birthe Søndergaard; Lotte Stig Haugbølle; Arne Melander
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve medication laboratory monitoring.

Authors:  Michael E Matheny; Thomas D Sequist; Andrew C Seger; Julie M Fiskio; Michael Sperling; Don Bugbee; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice.

Authors:  Pierre Durieux; Ludovic Trinquart; Isabelle Colombet; Julie Niès; Rt Walton; Anand Rajeswaran; Myriam Rège Walther; Emma Harvey; Bernard Burnand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
View more
  10 in total

1.  "Stealth" alerts to improve warfarin monitoring when initiating interacting medications.

Authors:  Kate E Koplan; Alan D Brush; Marvin S Packer; Fang Zhang; Margaret D Senese; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Biochemical monitoring of patients treated with antihypertensive therapy for adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah E McDowell; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  The association between use of a clinical decision support tool and adherence to monitoring for medication-laboratory guidelines in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  B Lau; C L Overby; H S Wirtz; E B Devine
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Patient completion of laboratory tests to monitor medication therapy: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Shira H Fischer; Terry S Field; Shawn J Gagne; Kathleen M Mazor; Peggy Preusse; George Reed; Daniel Peterson; Jerry H Gurwitz; Jennifer Tjia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A review on laboratory tests' utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings.

Authors:  Zahra Meidani; Mehrdad Farzandipour; Alireza Farrokhian; Masomeh Haghighat
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-05-08

6.  Patient Satisfaction With Venous Thromboembolism Treatment.

Authors:  David Webb; Kibum Kim; Casey R Tak; Daniel M Witt; Michael Feehan; Mark A Munger
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 7.  Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Rebecca Ryan; Nancy Santesso; Dianne Lowe; Sophie Hill; Jeremy Grimshaw; Megan Prictor; Caroline Kaufman; Genevieve Cowie; Michael Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-29

Review 8.  The economics of medicines optimization: policy developments, remaining challenges and research priorities.

Authors:  Rita Faria; Marco Barbieri; Kate Light; Rachel A Elliott; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Translation of evidence into kidney transplant clinical practice: managing drug-lab interactions by a context-aware clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Zahra Niazkhani; Mahsa Fereidoni; Parviz Rashidi Khazaee; Afshin Shiva; Khadijeh Makhdoomi; Andrew Georgiou; Habibollah Pirnejad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards.

Authors:  Juan E Tello; Erica Barbazza; Kerry Waddell
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 2.980

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.