Literature DB >> 21981433

Biochemical monitoring of patients treated with antihypertensive therapy for adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

Sarah E McDowell1, Robin E Ferner.   

Abstract

Biochemical monitoring of patients treated with antihypertensive therapy is recommended in order to identify potential adverse reactions to treatment. We aimed to review the literature investigating the nature of biochemical monitoring in adults treated in primary care with antihypertensive drugs. Specifically, we wished to establish (i) the proportion of patients with biochemical baseline testing prior to the initiation of antihypertensive therapy; (ii) the proportion of patients with biochemical monitoring after initiation of antihypertensive therapy; (iii) the patient characteristics associated with biochemical monitoring; (iv) the frequency of biochemical monitoring after the initiation of antihypertensive therapy; and (v) the relationship, if any, between biochemical monitoring and adverse patient outcomes. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar from 1948 to 31 December 2010 using a combination of text words and search terms. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, randomized controlled trials or quasi-randomized controlled trials, and audits of current clinical practice were included. Clinical trials, case reports and case series were excluded. Studies were included if they provided data on the proportion of patients treated with antihypertensive therapy in primary care who had any biochemical monitoring before or after the initiation of therapy. In total, 15 studies were included in our review, which used a wide variety of definitions of monitoring prior to and after the initiation of antihypertensive therapy. From 17% to 81% of patients treated with antihypertensive drugs had a baseline biochemical test and from 20% to 79% had any follow-up monitoring. In only 7 of the 12 studies that examined follow-up monitoring did more than half of the patients have any monitoring. Overall, this systematic review provides evidence that monitoring as recommended by published guidelines is not commonly undertaken. Only two studies were identified that examined patients with both baseline testing and follow-up monitoring. Omission of one or the other limits the ability to analyse the effect of treatment on electrolyte concentrations or renal function. There is limited research on the patient factors associated with monitoring and further work is required to determine the impact of monitoring on adverse patient outcomes. Important barriers to effective monitoring exist and this review emphasizes that these have not yet been overcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21981433     DOI: 10.2165/11593980-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  43 in total

1.  Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Nidhi R Shah; Andrew C Seger; Diane L Seger; Julie M Fiskio; Gilad J Kuperman; Barry Blumenfeld; Elaine G Recklet; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The quality of information on monitoring for haematological adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  R E Ferner; Jamie Coleman; Munir Pirmohamed; Simon A Constable; Andrew Rouse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Turning off frequently overridden drug alerts: limited opportunities for doing it safely.

Authors:  Heleen van der Sijs; Jos Aarts; Teun van Gelder; Marc Berg; Arnold Vulto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Using health information technology to improve drug monitoring: a systematic review.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Hayward; Aaron J Parnes; Steven R Simon
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Adherence to biochemical monitoring recommendations in patients starting with renin angiotensin system inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Janet E M Bootsma; Margreet F Warlé-van Herwaarden; André L M Verbeek; Peter Füssenich; Peter A G M De Smet; Marcel G Olde Rikkert; Cornelis Kramers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Academic detailing to improve laboratory testing among outpatient medication users.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Margaret J Gunter; John Hsu; Scott Kaatz; Richard Krajenta; Richard Platt; Lonni Schultz; Joseph V Selby; Steven R Simon; Jan Simpkins; Stephen B Soumerai; Connie Uratsu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Questionnaire study and audit of use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and monitoring in general practice: the need for guidelines to prevent renal failure.

Authors:  P A Kalra; M Kumwenda; P MacDowall; M O Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-23

Review 9.  Antihypertensive therapy and its effects on potassium homeostasis.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Laboratory testing in newly treated elderly hypertensive patients without co-morbidities: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Finlay Aleck McAlister; Karen Tu; Sumit R Majumdar; Rajdeep Padwal; Zhongliang Chen; Norman R C Campbell
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2007-06-12
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Balanced prescribing - principles and challenges.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  A practical guide to monitoring for adverse drug reactions during antihypertensive drug therapy.

Authors:  Sarah E McDowell; Sarah K Thomas; Jamie J Coleman; Jeffrey K Aronson; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Adherence to renal function monitoring guidelines in patients starting antihypertensive therapy with diuretics and RAAS inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jan C van Blijderveen; Sabine M Straus; Maria A de Ridder; Bruno H Stricker; Miriam C Sturkenboom; Katia M Verhamme
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Laboratory monitoring of patients treated with antihypertensive drugs and newly exposed to non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Fournier; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre; Agnès Sommet; Julie Dupouy; Jean-Christophe Poutrain; Jean-Louis Montastruc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of thiazide-induced hyponatraemia: time to reconsider electrolyte monitoring regimens after thiazide initiation?

Authors:  Jennifer Barber; Tricia M McKeever; Sarah E McDowell; Jennifer A Clayton; Robin E Ferner; Richard D Gordon; Michael Stowasser; Kevin M O'Shaughnessy; Ian P Hall; Mark Glover
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Adherence to guidelines for creatinine and potassium monitoring and discontinuation following renin-angiotensin system blockade: a UK general practice-based cohort study.

Authors:  Morten Schmidt; Kathryn E Mansfield; Krishnan Bhaskaran; Dorothea Nitsch; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Liam Smeeth; Laurie A Tomlinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Nanosensors-Assisted Quantitative Analysis of Biochemical Processes in Droplets.

Authors:  Dmitry Belyaev; Julian Schütt; Bergoi Ibarlucea; Taiuk Rim; Larysa Baraban; Gianaurelio Cuniberti
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.