Literature DB >> 20961923

Reproductive isolation and pollination success of rewarding Galearis diantha and non-rewarding Ponerorchis chusua (Orchidaceae).

Hai-Qin Sun1, Bao-Qiang Huang, Xiao-Hong Yu, Yong Kou, De-Jun An, Yi-Bo Luo, Song Ge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increasing evidence challenges the conventional perception that orchids are the most distinct example of floral diversification due to floral or prezygotic isolation. Regarding the relationship between co-flowering plants, rewarding and non-rewarding orchids in particular, few studies have investigated whether non-rewarding plants affect the pollination success of rewarding plants. Here, floral isolation and mutual effects between the rewarding orchid Galearis diantha and the non-rewarding orchid Ponerorchis chusua were investigated.
METHODS: Flowering phenological traits were monitored by noting the opening and wilting dates of the chosen individual plants. The pollinator pool and pollinator behaviour were assessed from field observations. Key morphological traits of the flowers and pollinators were measured directly in the field. Pollinator limitation and interspecific compatibility were evaluated by hand-pollination experiments. Fruit set was surveyed in monospecific and heterospecific plots. KEY
RESULTS: The species had overlapping peak flowering periods. Pollinators of both species displayed a certain degree of constancy in visiting each species, but they also visited other flowers before landing on the focal orchids. A substantial difference in spur size between the species resulted in the deposition of pollen on different regions of the body of the shared pollinator. Hand-pollination experiments revealed that fruit set was strongly pollinator-limited in both species. No significant difference in fruit set was found between monospecific plots and heterospecific plots.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of mechanical isolation and incomplete ethological isolation eliminates the possibility of pollen transfer between the species. These results do not support either the facilitation or competition hypothesis regarding the effect of nearby rewarding flowers on non-rewarding plants. The absence of a significant effect of non-rewarding P. chusua on rewarding G. diantha can be ascribed to low levels of overlap between the pollinator pools of two species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20961923      PMCID: PMC3002470          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  24 in total

1.  Floral mimicry: a fascinating yet poorly understood phenomenon.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 2.  Natural selection at work.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Does selection on floral odor promote differentiation among populations and species of the sexually deceptive orchid genus Ophrys?

Authors:  Jim Mant; Rod Peakall; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Evidence for pollinator sharing in Mediterranean nectar-mimic orchids: absence of premating barriers?

Authors:  Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl; Andreas Müller; Olga De Castro; Antonio Marco Nardella; Alex Widmer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pollinator limitation and inbreeding depression in orchid species with and without nectar rewards.

Authors:  Ann Smithson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception?

Authors:  Salvatore Cozzolino; Alex Widmer
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers.

Authors:  Justen B Whittall; Scott A Hodges
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Authors:  D W Schemske; H D Bradshaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingophilous species of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reproductive Isolation Among Three Nocturnal Moth-Pollinated Sympatric Habenaria Species (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Hai-Ping Zhang; Zhi-Bin Tao; Judith Trunschke; Mani Shrestha; Daniela Scaccabarozzi; Hong Wang; Zong-Xin Ren
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  More than euglossines: the diverse pollinators and floral scents of Zygopetalinae orchids.

Authors:  Carlos E P Nunes; Marina Wolowski; Emerson Ricardo Pansarin; Günter Gerlach; Izar Aximoff; Nicolas J Vereecken; Marcos José Salvador; Marlies Sazima
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-10-13

3.  Both morph- and species-dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species.

Authors:  Barbara Keller; Jurriaan M de Vos; Alexander N Schmidt-Lebuhn; James D Thomson; Elena Conti
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Multiple factors contribute to reproductive isolation between two co-existing Habenaria species (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Wenliu Zhang; Jiangyun Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.