Literature DB >> 20961368

Utility of preoperative imaging in evaluating colorectal liver metastases declines over time.

Simon Yang1, Sermsak Hongjinda, Sherif S Hanna, Steven Gallinger, Alice C Wei, Alex Kiss, Calvin Law.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reports on the sensitivity and accuracy of contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography (HCT) in the preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) have been conflicting. Few studies have controlled for and reported on the time interval between HCT and eventual surgery.
METHODS: A multi-institution, retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for CLM from January 1999 to September 2004 was conducted. Data regarding lesion characteristics and resectability were extracted from radiology reports, operative findings and histopathological records. Findings in HCT were evaluated according to their sensitivity for detecting CLM and ability to predict resectability.
RESULTS: A total of 217 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for CLM were identified. The overall sensitivity of HCT for detection of CLM was 83.2%. Prolonged time between imaging and surgery was a negative predictor for HCT sensitivity in univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). In predicting resectability, preoperative HCT was accurate 77.0% of the time. The time interval to surgery was negatively correlated with HCT prediction accuracy in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The utility of HCT as a preoperative tool to evaluate CLM is inversely proportional to the time interval between imaging and surgery. This may explain conflicting reports of the accuracy of HCT in the current literature.
© 2010 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20961368      PMCID: PMC2999787          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00202.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  22 in total

1.  Surgically staged focal liver lesions: accuracy and reproducibility of dual-phase helical CT for detection and characterization.

Authors:  Ihab R Kamel; Michael A Choti; Karen M Horton; H J V Braga; Bernard A Birnbaum; Elliot K Fishman; Richard E Thompson; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Intraoperative ultrasonography versus helical computed tomography and computed tomography with arterioportography in diagnosing colorectal liver metastases: lesion-by-lesion analysis.

Authors:  J Schmidt; M Strotzer; S Fraunhofer; H Boedeker; H Zirngibl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: preoperative detection and assessment of resectability with helical CT.

Authors:  C Valls; E Andía; A Sánchez; A Gumà; J Figueras; J Torras; T Serrano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Emile F I Comans; Milan E J Pijl; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Is hepatic resection justified after chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases and lymph node involvement?

Authors:  René Adam; Robbert J de Haas; Dennis A Wicherts; Thomas A Aloia; Valérie Delvart; Daniel Azoulay; Henri Bismuth; Denis Castaing
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Metastatic tumor doubling time: most important prehepatectomy predictor of survival and nonrecurrence of hepatic colorectal cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Kuniya Tanaka; Hiroshi Shimada; Masaru Miura; Yoshiro Fujii; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Itaru Endo; Hitoshi Sekido; Shinji Togo; Hideyuki Ike
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Metachronous liver metastases and resectability: Fong's score and laparoscopic evaluation.

Authors:  G Li Destri; F Di Benedetto; B Torrisi; T R Portale; F Mosca; R Vecchio; A Di Cataldo; S Puleo
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  Expanding criteria for resectability of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-01

Review 9.  Resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  J Scheele; A Altendorf-Hofmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Predictors of survival after hepatic resection among patients with colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  X Wang; D L Hershman; J A Abrams; D Feingold; V R Grann; J S Jacobson; A I Neugut
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is intra-operative ultrasound still useful for the detection of a hepatic tumour in the era of modern pre-operative imaging?

Authors:  Mathieu D'Hondt; Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu; Sébastien Préville-Ratelle; Simon Turcotte; Miguel Chagnon; Marylène Plasse; Richard Létourneau; Michel Dagenais; André Roy; Réal Lapointe
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Patient tailored resection planning in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases; how and why should you do it?

Authors:  C S van Kessel; M S van Leeuwen; R van Hillegersberg; I H M Borel Rinkes; M A A J van den Bosch; I Q Molenaar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The effect of intraoperative imaging on surgical navigation for laparoscopic liver resection surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Teatini; Egidijus Pelanis; Davit L Aghayan; Rahul Prasanna Kumar; Rafael Palomar; Åsmund Avdem Fretland; Bjørn Edwin; Ole Jakob Elle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.