Literature DB >> 20960577

Uniform prostate imaging and spectroscopy at 7 T: comparison between a microstrip array and an endorectal coil.

Bob van den Bergen1, Dennis W J Klomp, Alexander J E Raaijmakers, Catalina Arteaga de Castro, Vincent O Boer, Hugo Kroeze, Peter R Luijten, Jan J W Lagendijk, Cornelis A T van den Berg.   

Abstract

An endorectal coil and an eight-element microstrip array were compared for prostate imaging at 7 T. An extensive radiofrequency safety assessment was performed with the use of finite difference time domain simulations to determine safe scan parameters. These simulations showed that the endorectal coil can deliver substantially more B(1)(+) to the prostate than can the microstrip array within the specific absorption rate safety guidelines. However, the B(1)(+) field of the endorectal coil is very inhomogeneous, which makes the use of adiabatic pulses compulsory for T(1) - or T(2) -weighted imaging. As a consequence, a full prostate examination is only possible in a feasible amount of time when the microstrip array is used for T(1) - and T(2) -weighted imaging, whereas the endorectal coil is required for spectroscopic imaging. The pulse parameters were optimised within the specific absorption rate guidelines and thereafter used to provide a good illustration of the possibilities of prostate imaging at 7 T.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20960577     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  9 in total

1.  Interventional loopless antenna at 7 T.

Authors:  Mehmet Arcan Ertürk; Abdel-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Sensitivity enhancement of traveling wave MRI using free local resonators: an experimental demonstration.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-04

3.  Hepatic fat assessment using advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Yong Pang; Baiying Yu; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-09

4.  Numerical Analysis of Human Sample Effect on RF Penetration and Liver MR Imaging at Ultrahigh Field.

Authors:  Yong Pang; Bing Wu; Chunsheng Wang; Daniel B Vigneron; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.176

Review 5.  Ultra-high-field MR in Prostate cancer: Feasibility and Potential.

Authors:  Carlijn J A Tenbergen; Gregory J Metzger; Tom W J Scheenen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  7 Tesla MRI with a transmit/receive loopless antenna and B1-insensitive selective excitation.

Authors:  M Arcan Erturk; AbdEl-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Jay Moore; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Parallel transmission for ultrahigh-field imaging.

Authors:  Francesco Padormo; Arian Beqiri; Joseph V Hajnal; Shaihan J Malik
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Design of a forward view antenna for prostate imaging at 7 T.

Authors:  Bart R Steensma; Ingmar Voogt; Abe J van der Werf; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Peter R Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp; Alexander J E Raaijmakers
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Upcoming imaging concepts and their impact on treatment planning and treatment response in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Paul Russell Roberts; Ashesh B Jani; Satyaseelan Packianathan; Ashley Albert; Rahul Bhandari; Srinivasan Vijayakumar
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.