Literature DB >> 20960500

Tumor response and progression-free survival as potential surrogate endpoints for overall survival in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: findings on the basis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials.

Nathan R Foster1, Yingwei Qi, Qian Shi, James E Krook, John W Kugler, James R Jett, Julian R Molina, Steven E Schild, Alex A Adjei, Sumithra J Mandrekar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated the putative surrogate endpoints of best response, complete response (CR), confirmed response, and progression-free survival (PFS) for associations with overall survival (OS), and as possible surrogate endpoints for OS. <br> METHODS: Individual patient data from 870 untreated extensive stage small-cell lung cancer patients participating in 6 single-arm (274 patients) and 3 randomized trials (596 patients) were pooled. Patient-level associations between putative surrogate endpoints and OS were assessed by Cox models using landmark analyses. Trial-level surrogacy of putative surrogate endpoints were assessed by the association of treatment effects on OS and individual putative surrogate endpoints. Trial-level surrogacy measures included: R(2) from weighted least squares regression model, Spearman correlation coefficient, and R(2) from bivariate survival model (Copula R(2) ). <br> RESULTS: Median OS and PFS were 9.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1-10.0) and 5.5 (95% CI, 5.2-5.9) months, respectively; best response, CR, and confirmed response rates were 44%, 22%, and 34%, respectively. Patient-level associations showed that PFS status at 4 months was a strong predictor of subsequent survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.35-0.51; concordance index 0.63; P < .01), with 6-month PFS being the strongest (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35-0.49; concordance index, 0.66, P < .01). At the trial level, PFS showed the highest level of surrogacy for OS (weighted least squares R(2) = 0.79; Copula R(2) = 0.80), explaining 79% of the variance in OS. Tumor response endpoints showed lower surrogacy levels (weighted least squares R(2) ≤0.48). <br> CONCLUSIONS: PFS was strongly associated with OS at both the patient and trial levels. PFS also shows promise as a potential surrogate for OS, but further validation is needed using data from a larger number of randomized phase 3 trials.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20960500      PMCID: PMC3025267          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Phase II NCCTG trial of oral topotecan and paclitaxel with G-CSF (filgrastim) support in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Julian R Molina; James R Jett; Nathan Foster; Bradley S Lair; Thomas J Carroll; Henry D Tazelaar; Shauna Hillman; James A Mailliard; Albert M Bernath; Daniel Nikcevich
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  Simulation studies of surrogate endpoint validation using single trial and multitrial statistical approaches.

Authors:  Marissa Lassere; Kent Johnson; Michael Hughes; Doug Altman; Marc Buyse; Sally Galbraith; George Wells
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 3.  Stable disease is a valid end point in clinical trials.

Authors:  Anthony W Tolcher
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

4.  Improving the efficiency of clinical trials: a medical perspective.

Authors:  C G Moertel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mary E R O'Brien; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Hristo Tsekov; Yaroslav Shparyk; Branka Cuceviá; Gabor Juhasz; Nicholas Thatcher; Graham A Ross; Graham C Dane; Theresa Crofts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Novel therapies for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a time for cautious optimism?

Authors:  Ruth E Board; Nick Thatcher; Paul Lorigan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  End points for colon cancer adjuvant trials: observations and recommendations based on individual patient data from 20,898 patients enrolled onto 18 randomized trials from the ACCENT Group.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Smitha Patiyil; Greg Yothers; Daniel G Haller; Richard Gray; Jacqueline Benedetti; Marc Buyse; Roberto Labianca; Jean Francois Seitz; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Guido Francini; Axel Grothey; Michael O'Connell; Paul J Catalano; David Kerr; Erin Green; Harry S Wieand; Richard M Goldberg; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Phase III trial of irinotecan/cisplatin compared with etoposide/cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: clinical and pharmacogenomic results from SWOG S0124.

Authors:  Primo N Lara; Ronald Natale; John Crowley; Heinz Josef Lenz; Mary W Redman; Jane E Carleton; James Jett; Corey J Langer; J Philip Kuebler; Shaker R Dakhil; Kari Chansky; David R Gandara
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Measurable or assessable disease in lung cancer trials: does it matter?

Authors:  J R Jett; J Q Su; J E Krook; R M Goldberg; J W Kugler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  54 in total

1.  Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in brain metastases of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Authors:  Anna Sophie Berghoff; Gerda Ricken; Dorothee Wilhelm; Orsolya Rajky; Georg Widhalm; Karin Dieckmann; Peter Birner; Rupert Bartsch; Matthias Preusser
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Modified one-day etoposide and cisplatin combination for previously untreated extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective evaluation of 36 cases.

Authors:  Su-Hee Cho; Hyun Kuk Kim; Hang Jea Jang; Min Jae Park
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-29

3.  Another disappointing result, but how good is it?

Authors:  Yasushi Goto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors and small cell lung cancer: what's new?

Authors:  Sabine Schmid; Martin Früh
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Survival analyses in lung cancer.

Authors:  Kari Chansky; Dragan Subotic; Nathan R Foster; Torsten Blum
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Evaluation of classical clinical endpoints as surrogates for overall survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Howard L Kaufman; Lawrence H Schwartz; William N William; Mario Sznol; Kyle Fahrbach; Yingxin Xu; Eric Masson; Andrea Vergara-Silva
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Alternate Endpoints for Phase II Trials in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imaoka; Mitsuhito Sasaki; Hideaki Takahashi; Yusuke Hashimoto; Izumi Ohno; Shuichi Mitsunaga; Kazuo Watanabe; Kumiko Umemoto; Gen Kimura; Yuko Suzuki; Motoyasu Kan; Masafumi Ikeda
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-02

8.  Raising the bar for enthusiasm when looking at results of randomized phase II trials-the case of sunitinib in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Di Maio; Paolo Bironzo; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02

Review 9.  Treatment for small cell lung cancer, where are we now?-a review.

Authors:  Gabriela Alvarado-Luna; Daniela Morales-Espinosa
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02

10.  Individual-level data on the relationships of progression-free survival and post-progression survival with overall survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients who received second-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hisao Imai; Keita Mori; Akira Ono; Hiroaki Akamatsu; Tetsuhiko Taira; Hirotsugu Kenmotsu; Tateaki Naito; Kyoichi Kaira; Haruyasu Murakami; Masahiro Endo; Takashi Nakajima; Toshiaki Takahashi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.