Literature DB >> 20960498

Midtreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Pier Luigi Zinzani1, Letizia Gandolfi, Alessandro Broccoli, Lisa Argnani, Stefano Fanti, Cinzia Pellegrini, Vittorio Stefoni, Enrico Derenzini, Federica Quirini, Michele Baccarani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (PET) scan has increased considerably in the clinical management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, and its role as a prognostic factor during chemotherapy has been established recently.
METHODS: Between May 2003 and May 2009, 91 newly diagnosed patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were treated with 12 weekly cycles of rituximab-MACOP-B (n = 12 patients with PMLBCL), 6 cycles of rituximab-CHOP21 (n = 65 patients with DLBCL, aged < 60 years and 1 patient with PMLBCL), or 8 weekly cycles of rituximab-VNCOP-B (n = 13 DLBCL patients, aged ≥ 60 years). All patients underwent a staging PET examination at baseline and a midtreatment (interim) PET examination after 6 weeks of rituximab-MACOP-B treatment, 3 cycles of rituximab-CHOP21 treatment, or 4 weeks of rituximab-VNCOP-B treatment and again at the end of the chemo-immunotherapy regimen.
RESULTS: At midtreatment evaluation, 35 patients showed a persistently positive PET scan; only 6 (17%) of these patients achieved a continuous complete response (CCR). However, 56 patients presented with a negative interim PET, and 50 (89%) of these patients achieved and maintained a CCR. Comparison between the 2 PET groups indicated a statistically significant association between PET findings and event-free survival (P = .0001) and overall survival (P = .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that midtreatment PET may represent a significant step forward in helping physicians make crucial decisions on further treatment. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20960498     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  23 in total

1.  Optimal timing and criteria of interim PET in DLBCL: a comparative study of 1692 patients.

Authors:  J J Eertink; C N Burggraaff; M W Heymans; U Dührsen; A Hüttmann; C Schmitz; S Müller; P J Lugtenburg; S F Barrington; N G Mikhaeel; R Carr; S Czibor; T Györke; L Ceriani; E Zucca; M Hutchings; L Kostakoglu; A Loft; S Fanti; S E Wiegers; S Pieplenbosch; R Boellaard; O S Hoekstra; J M Zijlstra; H C W de Vet
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-05-11

2.  Dynamic Risk Profiling Using Serial Tumor Biomarkers for Personalized Outcome Prediction.

Authors:  David M Kurtz; Mohammad S Esfahani; Florian Scherer; Joanne Soo; Michael C Jin; Chih Long Liu; Aaron M Newman; Ulrich Dührsen; Andreas Hüttmann; Olivier Casasnovas; Jason R Westin; Matthais Ritgen; Sebastian Böttcher; Anton W Langerak; Mark Roschewski; Wyndham H Wilson; Gianluca Gaidano; Davide Rossi; Jasmin Bahlo; Michael Hallek; Robert Tibshirani; Maximilian Diehn; Ash A Alizadeh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; N George Mikhaeel; Lale Kostakoglu; Michel Meignan; Martin Hutchings; Stefan P Müeller; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; Richard I Fisher; Judith Trotman; Otto S Hoekstra; Rodney J Hicks; Michael J O'Doherty; Roland Hustinx; Alberto Biggi; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The value of FDG PET/CT imaging in outcome prediction and response assessment of lymphoma patients treated with immunotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Zahra Kiamanesh; Narjess Ayati; Ramin Sadeghi; Eliza Hawkes; Sze Ting Lee; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Current role of FDG PET/CT in lymphoma.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and prognosis of T cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Carla Casulo; Heiko Schöder; John Feeney; Remy Lim; Jocelyn Maragulia; Andrew D Zelenetz; Steven Horwitz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-03-04

7.  Response-adapted therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas based on early [18F] FDG-PET scanning: ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group study (E3404).

Authors:  Lode J Swinnen; Hailun Li; Andrew Quon; Randy Gascoyne; Fangxin Hong; Erik A Ranheim; Thomas M Habermann; Brad S Kahl; Sandra J Horning; Ranjana H Advani
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 8.  FDG-PET/CT based response-adapted treatment.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Dennis Vriens; Anne I J Arens; Martin Hutchings; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Malignant lymphoma with diffuse cardiac involvement detected by multiple imaging examinations: a case report.

Authors:  Toshiji Ishiwata; Norihiro Harada; Ryo Ko; Munechika Hara; Mitsuaki Sekiya; Makoto Sasaki; Bunsei Nobukawa; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-07-10

10.  FDG-PET in Follicular Lymphoma Management.

Authors:  C Bodet-Milin; T Eugène; T Gastinne; E Frampas; S Le Gouill; F Kraeber-Bodéré
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.