Literature DB >> 20960390

Risk factors for advanced lesions undetected at prior colonoscopy: not always poor preparation.

A Ferrández1, M Navarro, M Díez, F Sopena, P Roncalés, M Polo-Tomas, R Sáinz, A Lanas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Colonoscopy is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of colonic lesions. However, adenoma miss rates in tandem colonoscopy studies vary from 2 % to 26 %. We aimed to investigate the rates of advanced neoplasia in patients with a prior normal colonoscopy in an outpatient endoscopy unit.
METHODS: Review of reports for colonoscopies performed in our Endoscopy Unit from 2000 to 2005. Undetected lesions were defined as advanced adenoma or colorectal cancer (CRC) not reported in a colonoscopy performed in the previous 2 or 3 years, respectively. Patients with hereditary nonpolyposis CRC (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were excluded.
RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2005, 795 patients were diagnosed with at least one advanced adenoma and 386 with CRC. Among these, 107/795 patients (13.5 %) had advanced adenoma that had been undetected in a previous colonoscopy (39 % [53/135 lesions] in the right colon); 92/107 (86 %) had an undetected advanced adenoma ≥ 10 mm. Previously undetected CRCs were found in 27/386 patients (6.7 %), located in the left colon in 21/27 (78 %); in 7 the area had not been reached in the previous colonoscopy. Risk factors for undetected advanced adenoma were advanced age, male gender, the presence of another advanced adenoma at first colonoscopy, and history of advanced neoplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: Failure to detect advanced neoplasia is common in a community-based endoscopy facility. Previously undetected advanced lesions are more frequently found in the left colon and rectum. Risk factors for non-detection of advanced adenoma are similar to those for advanced neoplasia recurrence. Lowering non-detection rates is crucial for correct follow-up recommendations. Patients should be aware of rates of detection of advanced neoplasia after previous normal colonoscopic findings. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20960390     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

1.  Patient comfort and quality in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Kevin Dowler; Roland M Valori; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Interval colorectal cancers: what and why.

Authors:  Chantal M C le Clercq; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-03

Review 3.  Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Adler; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Bringing top-end endoscopy to regional australia: hurdles and benefits.

Authors:  J Van Den Bogaerde; D Sorrentino
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-09-09

5.  Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers identified by probabilistic and deterministic linkage: results in an Australian prospective cohort.

Authors:  Kavitha Subramaniam; P W Ang; Teresa Neeman; Mitali Fadia; Doug Taupin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies.

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Woo Shin Jeong; Hyo-Joon Yang; Soo-Kyung Park; Kyuyong Choi; Dong Il Park
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 7.  The Relationship between Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer and Quality Indicators of Colonoscopy: The Latest Single-center Cohort Study with a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hayato Yamaguchi; Masakatsu Fukuzawa; Hirohito Minami; Tadashi Ichimiya; Hiroshi Takahashi; Yubu Matsue; Mitsuyoshi Honjo; Yasutake Hirayama; Daisuke Nutahara; Junichi Taira; Hironori Nakamura; Takashi Kawai; Takao Itoi
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 1.271

8.  Can surveillance colonoscopy be discontinued in an elderly population with diminutive polyps?

Authors:  Hidenori Tanaka; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Katsuaki Inagaki; Yuki Okamoto; Kenta Matsumoto; Kazuki Boda; Ken Yamashita; Kyoku Sumimoto; Yuki Ninomiya; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2019-07-30

9.  Clinical Features and Genomic Characterization of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hidenori Tanaka; Yuji Urabe; Shiro Oka; Yasutsugu Shimohara; Tomoyuki Nishimura; Katsuaki Inagaki; Yuki Okamoto; Kenta Matsumoto; Ken Yamashita; Kyoku Sumimoto; Yuki Ninomiya; Ryo Yuge; Shinji Tanaka; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.396

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.