Literature DB >> 20960350

Robotic technology in spine surgery: current applications and future developments.

Carsten Stüer1, Florian Ringel, Michael Stoffel, Andreas Reinke, Michael Behr, Bernhard Meyer.   

Abstract

Medical robotics incrementally appears compelling in nowadays surgical work. The research regarding an ideal interaction between physician and computer assistance has reached a first summit with the implementation of commercially available robots (Intuitive Surgical's® da Vinci®). Moreover, neurosurgery--and herein spine surgery--seems an ideal candidate for computer assisted surgery. After the adoption of pure navigational support from brain surgery to spine surgery a meanwhile commercially available miniature robot (Mazor Surgical Technologies' The Spine Assist®) assists in drilling thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws. Pilot studies on efficacy, implementation into neurosurgical operating room work flow proved the accuracy of the system and we shortly outline them. Current applications are promising, and future possible developments seem far beyond imagination. But still, medical robotics is in its infancy. Many of its advantages and disadvantages must be delicately sorted out as the patients safety is of highest priority. Medical robots may achieve a physician's supplement but not substitute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20960350     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-99651-5_38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current state-of-the-art and future perspectives of robotic technology in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei; Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez; Deepak Sambhara; Ehud Mendel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Weikai Chen; Zongyi Wang; Jun Lin; Bin Meng; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Robotic-guided placement of cervical pedicle screws: feasibility and accuracy.

Authors:  Stanley Kisinde; Xiaobang Hu; Shea Hesselbacher; Alexander M Satin; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Advancing Molecular-Guided Surgery through probe development and testing in a moderate cost evaluation pipeline.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Sally M Hull; Kimberly S Samkoe; Jason Gunn; Jack Hoopes; David W Roberts; Theresa V Strong; Daniel Draney; Joachim Feldwisch
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-04

5.  Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement During Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Isador H Lieberman; Stanley Kisinde; Shea Hesselbacher
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2020-05-21

6.  Results of using robotic-assisted navigational system in pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Hsuan-Yu Chen; Xiu-Yun Xiao; Chih-Wei Chen; Hao-Kai Chou; Chen-Yu Sung; Feng-Huei Lin; Po-Quang Chen; Tze-Hong Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Computed Tomography-Based Navigation System in Current Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Nao Otomo; Haruki Funao; Kento Yamanouchi; Norihiro Isogai; Ken Ishii
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 8.  Minimally-Invasive Assisted Robotic Spine Surgery (MARSS).

Authors:  Ramiro A Pérez de la Torre; Siddharth Ramanathan; Ashley L Williams; Mick J Perez-Cruet
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-06

9.  Initial Intraoperative Experience with Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement with Cirq® Robotic Alignment: An Evaluation of the First 70 Screws.

Authors:  Mirza Pojskić; Miriam Bopp; Christopher Nimsky; Barbara Carl; Benjamin Saβ
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.