Literature DB >> 20959992

Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Wesley W Choi1, Marcos P Freire, Jane R Soukup, Lei Yin, Stuart R Lipsitz, Fernando Carvas, Stephen B Williams, Jim C Hu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize determinants of 4-, 12-, and 24-month urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
METHODS: Adjusted comparative study using prospectively collected, patient self-reported urinary control for 602 consecutive RALPs. Urinary control defined as: (1) EPIC urinary function (UF) scored from 0 to 100 and (2) continence (zero pads per day).
RESULTS: Both UF (62.8 vs. 42.4, P<0.001) and continence rates (47.2 vs. 26.7%, P=0.043) were better for bilateral nerve-sparing (BNS) vs. non-nerve-sparing (NNS) at 4 months, but only UF scores were significantly better at 12- (80.9 vs. 70.7, P=0.014) and 24-month (89.2 vs. 77.4, P=0.024) post-RALP. No difference in positive margin rates was observed. In multivariate analysis, older age (parameter estimate -0.42, 95% CI -0.80 to -0.04) and increasing gland volume (-0.13, CI -0.26 to -0.01) resulted in lower UF scores at 4 months, while higher pre-operative UF (0.25, CI 0.05-0.46), bladder neck-sparing technique (10.1, CI 3.79-16.35), BNS (19.1, CI 9.37-28.82), and unilateral nerve-sparing (19.00, CI 7.88-30.11) resulted in higher UF scores at 4 months. At 12 months, higher pre-operative UF (0.24, CI 0.083-0.40) and BNS (9.54, CI 1.92-17.16) resulted in higher UF scores. At 24 months, higher pre-operative UF (0.20, CI 0.06-0.33), bladder neck-sparing technique (7.80, CI 3.48-12.10), and BNS (7.86, CI 1.04-14.68) resulted in higher UF scores.
CONCLUSIONS: BNS, bladder neck-sparing technique, and higher pre-operative UF score result in improved 24-month urinary control after RALP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959992     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0601-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  28 in total

1.  Intraoperative nerve stimulation with measurement of urethral sphincter pressure changes during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Caleb P Nelson; James E Montie; Edward J McGuire; Gary Wedemeyer; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Intraoperative electrophysiological confirmation of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kaiho; Haruo Nakagawa; Yoshihiro Ikeda; Shunichi Namiki; Kenji Numahata; Makoto Satoh; Seiichi Saito; Koji Yoshimura; Akito Terai; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?

Authors:  Tracy P Marien; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Emilio Sacco; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Francesco Pinto; Simonetta Fracalanza; Giovanni Betto; Francesco Pagano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence.

Authors:  Angelo J Cambio; Christopher P Evans
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume--analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database.

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety; Natalia Sadetsky; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Preservation of lateral prostatic fascia is associated with urine continence after robotic-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  Henk G van der Poel; Willem de Blok; Neil Joshi; Eric van Muilekom
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence.

Authors:  M S Steiner; R A Morton; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  10 in total

1.  Natural orifice (NOTES) transurethral sutureless radical prostatectomy with thulium laser support: first patient report.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Ute Walcher; Andre P Nicklas; Axel S Merseburger; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Effect of minimizing tension during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary function recovery.

Authors:  Keith J Kowalczyk; Andy C Huang; Nathanael D Hevelone; Stuart R Lipsitz; Hua-yin Yu; John H Lynch; Jim C Hu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The Null Effect of Bladder Neck Size on Incontinence Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Jacob Ark; Justin R Gregg; Niels V Johnsen; Stephen F Kappa; Daniel J Lee; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  TGF-β/MAPK signaling mediates the effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on urinary control and interstitial cystitis after urinary bladder transplantation.

Authors:  Ya Xiao; Ya-Jun Song; Bo Song; Chi-Bing Huang; Qing Ling; Xiao Yu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  A comprehensive review of neuroanatomy of the prostate.

Authors:  Yong Hyun Park; Chang Wook Jeong; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-12-30

6.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: positive surgical margin and urinary continence status.

Authors:  Tomasz Golabek; Jaroslaw Jaskulski; Piotr Jarecki; Przemysław Dudek; Tomasz Szopiński; Piotr Chłosta
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 1.195

7.  Newer concepts in neural anatomy and neurovascular preservation in robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sailaja Pisipati; Adnan Ali; Rao S Mandalapu; George K Haines Iii; Paras Singhal; Balaji N Reddy; Robert Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10

8.  The association between the parameters of uroflowmetry and lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yuta Takeshima; Yuta Yamada; Kotaro Takemura; Naoki Kimura; Yuji Hakozaki; Jimpei Miyakawa; Satoru Taguchi; Yoshiyuki Akiyama; Yusuke Sato; Taketo Kawai; Daisuke Yamada; Tetsuya Fujimura; Haruki Kume
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Long-term functional outcomes of vesicourethral anastomosis with bladder neck preservation and distal urethral length preservation after videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tomasz Wiatr; Dominik Choragwicki; Katarzyna Gronostaj; Anna Czech; Mikolaj Przydacz; Marcin Chlosta; Lukasz Belch; Przemyslaw Dudek; Lukasz Curylo; Michal Zembrzuski; Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk; Piotr Chlosta
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 1.627

10.  "Total reconstruction" of the urethrovesical anastomosis contributes to early urinary continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xiaoxing Liao; Peng Qiao; Zhaohui Tan; Hongbin Shi; Nianzeng Xing
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.